BBCA ranks 4th and FLAU 5th of 38 funds in the Developed Single Country Category.
BBCA vs FLAU
FLAU −0.10pt a year
0.19%0.09%
BBCA 6.9×the volume
330K47.5K
BBCA +4.7pt
+11.5%+6.8%
BBCA vs FLAU Performance
+72.5%+39.0%
- BBCA 0.19%
- FLAU 0.09%, better
- BBCA $11.9B
- FLAU $227M
- BBCA +22.1%, better
- FLAU +13.0%
- BBCA 1.68%
- FLAU 3.05%, better
- BBCA 78
- FLAU 105
- BBCA 330K sh, better
- FLAU 47.5K sh
- BBCA $104.51
- FLAU $35.23
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BBCA | FLAU |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A82 | A93Higher |
| Mission | B59 | A83Higher |
| Risk | A87Higher | C50 |
| Tradability | B55Higher | D37 |
| Holdings | A76Higher | B63 |
| Durability | B58Higher | C45 |
Rank among Developed Single Country funds
Same Category. BBCA and FLAU are both graded against the same 38 Developed Single Country funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BBCAA
FLAUA
In short
BBCA Canada, at a discount. BBCA tracks a Morningstar index of roughly 80 Canadian stocks for 0.19% a year, a fraction of what most single-country funds charge, and it has grown into a multi-billion-dollar fund since its 2018 launch.
FLAU Australia for nine basis points. Franklin's 2017 country fund holds a capped index of roughly 110 Australian stocks, so no single name swallows the basket, at a sliver of what the older single-country ETFs charge.
Stated mandate
BBCA The fund seeks to track the Morningstar Canada Target Market Exposure Index before fees and expenses. It uses a passive indexing approach to approximate the index rather than outperform it.
FLAU The Fund seeks investment results that closely track the performance of the FTSE Australia RIC Capped Index before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BBCA vs FLAU Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BBCA vs FLAU Cost
Overpaying BBCA vs FLAU
$2,054
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BBCA 0.19%
$3,952
FLAU 0.09%
$1,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BBCA | FLAU | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $347 | $165 | $182 |
| 20 | $1,351 | $646 | $705 |
| 30 | $3,952 | $1,898 | $2,054 |
- 0.19%BBCA
- 0.09%FLAU, cheaper
- Middle half of Developed Single Country funds
- Median 0.50%
FLAU cheapest of 38 funds
BBCA 7th cheapest of 38 funds
BBCA vs FLAU Dividends
- BBCA 1.68%
- FLAU 3.05%, better
- BBCA $1.75
- FLAU $1.07
- BBCA $0.42
- FLAU $0.49
- BBCA Sep 22, 2026
- FLAU Jun 26, 2026
- BBCA Sep 24, 2026
- FLAU Jul 6, 2026
- BBCA Quarterly
- FLAU Twice a year
Distribution history
BBCA vs FLAU Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- BBCA
- FLAU
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BBCA 12.9%, betterFLAU 16.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- BBCA 1.55, betterFLAU 0.78
- Worst fall
- BBCA −24.4%, betterFLAU −24.7%
- Market sensitivity
- BBCA 0.88FLAU 1.01
BBCA and FLAU in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.19% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

