EWC ranks 1st and FLAU 5th of 38 funds in the Developed Single Country Category.
EWC vs FLAU
FLAU −0.41pt a year
0.50%0.09%
EWC 35.5×the volume
1.68M47.5K
EWC +4.6pt
+11.4%+6.8%
EWC vs FLAU Performance
+71.2%+39.0%
- EWC 0.50%
- FLAU 0.09%, better
- EWC $7.58B
- FLAU $227M
- EWC +21.1%, better
- FLAU +13.0%
- EWC 1.24%
- FLAU 3.05%, better
- EWC 83
- FLAU 105
- EWC 1.68M sh, better
- FLAU 47.5K sh
- EWC $60.62
- FLAU $35.23
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EWC | FLAU |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B55 | A93Higher |
| Mission | A90Higher | A83 |
| Risk | A87Higher | C50 |
| Tradability | A97Higher | D37 |
| Holdings | A78Higher | B63 |
| Durability | A80Higher | C45 |
Rank among Developed Single Country funds
Same Category. EWC and FLAU are both graded against the same 38 Developed Single Country funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EWCA
FLAUA
In short
EWC A 1996 original: Canada's large and mid caps in one ticker, back when single-country funds were still a novelty. About 80 names, held through a capped MSCI index built so one giant can't swamp the basket.
FLAU Australia for nine basis points. Franklin's 2017 country fund holds a capped index of roughly 110 Australian stocks, so no single name swallows the basket, at a sliver of what the older single-country ETFs charge.
Stated mandate
EWC The fund seeks to track an index representing Canadian equities, providing exposure to large- and mid-sized companies in Canada.
FLAU The Fund seeks investment results that closely track the performance of the FTSE Australia RIC Capped Index before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EWC vs FLAU Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EWC vs FLAU Cost
Overpaying EWC vs FLAU
$8,081
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EWC 0.50%
$9,979
FLAU 0.09%
$1,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EWC | FLAU | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $165 | $735 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $646 | $2,814 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $1,898 | $8,081 |
- 0.50%EWC
- 0.09%FLAU, cheaper
- Middle half of Developed Single Country funds
- Median 0.50%
FLAU cheapest of 38 funds
EWC 14th cheapest of 38 funds
EWC vs FLAU Dividends
- EWC 1.24%
- FLAU 3.05%, better
- EWC $0.75
- FLAU $1.07
- EWC $0.28
- FLAU $0.49
- EWC Jun 15, 2026
- FLAU Jun 26, 2026
- EWC Jun 18, 2026
- FLAU Jul 6, 2026
- EWC Twice a year
- FLAU Twice a year
Distribution history
EWC vs FLAU Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EWC
- FLAU
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EWC 13.1%, betterFLAU 16.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- EWC 1.54, betterFLAU 0.78
- Worst fall
- EWC −24.8%FLAU −24.7%, better
- Market sensitivity
- EWC 0.88FLAU 1.01
EWC and FLAU in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





