HYLB ranks 2nd and BBHY 6th of 84 funds in the US High Yield Category.
BBHY vs HYLB
HYLB −0.02pt a year
0.07%0.05%
HYLB 13.5×the volume
90.2K1.22M
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
+3.6%+3.6%
BBHY vs HYLB Performance
+19.1%+19.1%
- BBHY 0.07%
- HYLB 0.05%, better
- BBHY $703M
- HYLB $3.3B
- BBHY +1.7%
- HYLB +1.8%, better
- BBHY 7.86%, better
- HYLB 7.33%
- BBHY 1702
- HYLB 1280
- BBHY 90.2K sh
- HYLB 1.22M sh, better
- BBHY $44.28
- HYLB $35.23
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BBHY | HYLB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A94 | A98Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C54 | B60Higher |
| Tradability | C51 | A91Higher |
| Holdings | A93Higher | A88 |
| Durability | A81Higher | A77 |
Rank among US High Yield funds
Same Category. BBHY and HYLB are both graded against the same 84 US High Yield funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BBHYA
HYLBA
In short
BBHY Junk bonds without the markup. BBHY tracks the full ICE BofA US High Yield Index across roughly 1,600 issues for 0.07% a year and pays monthly: a plain, broad-market build with no ratings tilts or sector screens.
HYLB Broad-market junk bonds at index-fund pricing: 0.05% a year, a fraction of what the typical high-yield bond ETF charges, spread across roughly 1,300 issues. Running since 2016, it pays monthly.
Stated mandate
BBHY The ETF seeks to provide exposure to U.S. high-yield debt by using a passive approach intended to closely replicate the ICE BofA US High Yield Index.
HYLB The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the Solactive USD High Yield Corporates Total Market Index. It uses a passive representative-sampling indexing approach.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BBHY vs HYLB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BBHY vs HYLB Cost
Overpaying BBHY vs HYLB
$420
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BBHY 0.07%
$1,480
HYLB 0.05%
$1,060
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BBHY | HYLB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $128 | $92 | $36 |
| 20 | $503 | $360 | $143 |
| 30 | $1,480 | $1,060 | $420 |
- 0.07%BBHY
- 0.05%HYLB, cheaper
- Middle half of US High Yield funds
- Median 0.42%
HYLB 2nd cheapest of 84 funds
BBHY 5th cheapest of 84 funds
BBHY vs HYLB Dividends
- BBHY 7.86%, better
- HYLB 7.33%
- BBHY $3.46
- HYLB $2.57
- BBHY $0.27
- HYLB $0.19
- BBHY Nov 2, 2026
- HYLB Nov 2, 2026
- BBHY Pays Nov 4, 2026
- HYLB Pays Nov 9, 2026
- BBHY Monthly
- HYLB Monthly
Distribution history
BBHY vs HYLB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- BBHY
- HYLB
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BBHY 4.6%, betterHYLB 4.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- BBHY 0.82HYLB 0.82Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Worst fall
- BBHY −15.3%, betterHYLB −15.5%
- Market sensitivity
- BBHY 0.65HYLB 0.66
Popular comparisons
- 0.07% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.