SCYB ranks 2nd and BBHY 6th of 84 funds in the US High Yield Category.
BBHY vs SCYB
SCYB −0.04pt a year
0.07%0.03%
SCYB 12.2×the volume
90.2K1.1M
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
+7.7%+7.7%
BBHY vs SCYB Performance
+1.7%+2.0%
- BBHY 0.07%
- SCYB 0.03%, better
- BBHY $703M
- SCYB $2.8B
- BBHY +1.7%
- SCYB +2.0%, better
- BBHY 7.86%, better
- SCYB 7.82%
- BBHY 1702
- SCYB 1844
- BBHY 90.2K sh
- SCYB 1.1M sh, better
- BBHY $44.28
- SCYB $25.22
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BBHY | SCYB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A94 | A100Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C54 | B60Higher |
| Tradability | C51 | A81Higher |
| Holdings | A93 | A99Higher |
| Durability | A81Higher | B68 |
Rank among US High Yield funds
Same Category. BBHY and SCYB are both graded against the same 84 US High Yield funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BBHYA
SCYBA
In short
BBHY Junk bonds without the markup. BBHY tracks the full ICE BofA US High Yield Index across roughly 1,600 issues for 0.07% a year and pays monthly: a plain, broad-market build with no ratings tilts or sector screens.
SCYB Three basis points for the broad US high-yield corporate market. Schwab undercuts a category where the typical fund charges more than ten times as much, spreading the bet across roughly 1,800 bonds and paying monthly.
Stated mandate
BBHY The ETF seeks to provide exposure to U.S. high-yield debt by using a passive approach intended to closely replicate the ICE BofA US High Yield Index.
SCYB The fund follows a rules-based strategy intended to track the high-yield bond market, primarily through bonds in the Bloomberg Barclays US Corporate High Yield Total Return Index and similar derivatives.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BBHY vs SCYB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BBHY vs SCYB Cost
Overpaying BBHY vs SCYB
$842
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BBHY 0.07%
$1,480
SCYB 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BBHY | SCYB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $128 | $55 | $73 |
| 20 | $503 | $216 | $287 |
| 30 | $1,480 | $638 | $842 |
- 0.07%BBHY
- 0.03%SCYB, cheaper
- Middle half of US High Yield funds
- Median 0.42%
SCYB cheapest of 84 funds
BBHY 5th cheapest of 84 funds
BBHY vs SCYB Dividends
- BBHY 7.86%, better
- SCYB 7.82%
- BBHY $3.46
- SCYB $1.96
- BBHY $0.27
- SCYB $0.16
- BBHY Nov 2, 2026
- SCYB Nov 2, 2026
- BBHY Pays Nov 4, 2026
- SCYB Pays Nov 6, 2026
- BBHY Monthly
- SCYB Monthly
Distribution history
BBHY vs SCYB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BBHY 4.6%SCYB 4.6%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Return per unit of risk
- BBHY 0.82SCYB 0.82Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Worst fall
- BBHY −15.3%SCYB −4.9%
- Market sensitivity
- BBHY 0.65SCYB 0.28
BBHY and SCYB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.07% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
