IWR ranks 4th and BBMC 6th of 13 funds in the US Mid-Cap Category.
BBMC vs IWR
BBMC −0.11pt a year
0.07%0.18%
IWR 87.4×the volume
20.4K1.79M
IWR +0.3pt
+7.0%+7.3%
BBMC vs IWR Performance
+40.3%+42.1%
- BBMC 0.07%, better
- IWR 0.18%
- BBMC $2.11B
- IWR $58.1B
- BBMC +18.8%, better
- IWR +16.3%
- BBMC 1.15%
- IWR 1.16%, better
- BBMC 460
- IWR 827
- BBMC 20.4K sh
- IWR 1.79M sh, better
- BBMC $122.94
- IWR $110.06
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BBMC | IWR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B67Higher | C43 |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C46 | B68Higher |
| Tradability | D34 | A93Higher |
| Holdings | B69 | A83Higher |
| Durability | C50 | A86Higher |
Rank among US Mid-Cap funds
Same Category. BBMC and IWR are both graded against the same 13 US Mid-Cap funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BBMCB
IWRA
In short
BBMC J.P. Morgan's no-frills mid-cap sleeve: roughly 500 U.S. mid caps for 0.07% a year, less than half the typical fee in its peer group. No tilts, no theme, just the middle of the market at a discount.
IWR The Russell mid-cap standard: roughly 800 mid-sized US companies in one ticker, tracked since 2001. Big, heavily traded, and priced a notch above the index-fund floor.
Stated mandate
BBMC The fund is designed to provide U.S. mid-cap equity exposure through an indexed approach.
IWR The fund seeks to track an index composed of mid-sized U.S. companies.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BBMC vs IWR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BBMC vs IWR Cost
Overpaying IWR vs BBMC
$2,269
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BBMC 0.07%
$1,480
IWR 0.18%
$3,749
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BBMC | IWR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $128 | $328 | $200 |
| 20 | $503 | $1,281 | $778 |
| 30 | $1,480 | $3,749 | $2,269 |
- 0.07%BBMC, cheaper
- 0.18%IWR
- Middle half of US Mid-Cap funds
- Median 0.15%
BBMC 5th cheapest of 13 funds
IWR 8th cheapest of 13 funds
BBMC vs IWR Dividends
- BBMC 1.15%
- IWR 1.16%, better
- BBMC $1.41
- IWR $1.27
- BBMC $0.36
- IWR $0.33
- BBMC Sep 22, 2026
- IWR Sep 15, 2026
- BBMC Sep 24, 2026
- IWR Sep 18, 2026
- BBMC Quarterly
- IWR Quarterly
Distribution history
BBMC vs IWR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- BBMC
- IWR
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BBMC 16.2%IWR 14.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- BBMC 1.02IWR 1.08, better
- Worst fall
- BBMC −30.1%IWR −26.2%, better
- Market sensitivity
- BBMC 1.10IWR 1.01
Popular comparisons
- 0.07% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.