BBUS ranks 5th and FNDB 10th of 10 funds in the Total US Market Category.
BBUS vs FNDB
BBUS −0.23pt a year
0.02%0.25%
FNDB 1.4×the volume
224K323K
FNDB +1.5pt
+11.6%+13.1%
BBUS vs FNDB Performance
+72.8%+85.4%
- BBUS 0.02%, better
- FNDB 0.25%
- BBUS $9.56B
- FNDB $1.51B
- BBUS +11.3%
- FNDB +24.4%, better
- BBUS 1.01%
- FNDB 1.42%, better
- BBUS 470
- FNDB 1616
- BBUS 224K sh
- FNDB 323K sh, better
- BBUS $136.14
- FNDB $31.77
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BBUS | FNDB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A96Higher | F11 |
| Mission | A98Higher | A74 |
| Risk | C44 | B66Higher |
| Tradability | D35 | C42Higher |
| Holdings | D36 | A85Higher |
| Durability | D28 | D33Higher |
Rank among Total US Market funds
Same Category. BBUS and FNDB are both graded against the same 10 Total US Market funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BBUSA
FNDBC
In short
BBUS JPMorgan's two-basis-point answer to the total-market question: it undercuts the household-name index funds on fee, then holds a tighter book of roughly 500 large and mid caps instead of reaching for the whole market's tail.
FNDB Most total-market funds let share prices decide who's biggest. FNDB uses a different scoreboard: roughly 1,600 US companies weighted by fundamental measures of size, not market value.
Stated mandate
BBUS The fund seeks broad U.S. equity exposure through an indexed, passive approach tracking the Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index.
FNDB The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of an index covering U.S. companies and weighting them according to fundamental measures of size.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BBUS vs FNDB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BBUS vs FNDB Cost
Overpaying FNDB vs BBUS
$4,733
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BBUS 0.02%
$426
FNDB 0.25%
$5,159
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BBUS | FNDB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $37 | $455 | $418 |
| 20 | $144 | $1,769 | $1,625 |
| 30 | $426 | $5,159 | $4,733 |
- 0.02%BBUS, cheaper
- 0.25%FNDB
- Middle half of Total US Market funds
- Median 0.04%
BBUS cheapest of 10 funds
FNDB 10th cheapest of 10 funds
BBUS vs FNDB Dividends
- BBUS 1.01%
- FNDB 1.42%, better
- BBUS $1.37
- FNDB $0.45
- BBUS $0.35
- FNDB $0.12
- BBUS Sep 22, 2026
- FNDB Sep 23, 2026
- BBUS Sep 24, 2026
- FNDB Sep 28, 2026
- BBUS Quarterly
- FNDB Quarterly
Distribution history
BBUS vs FNDB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- BBUS
- FNDB
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BBUS 12.5%FNDB 11.7%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- BBUS 1.39FNDB 1.48, better
- Worst fall
- BBUS −25.5%FNDB −19.3%, better
- Market sensitivity
- BBUS 1.02FNDB 0.89
Popular comparisons
- 0.02% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.02% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.02% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.