SPTM ranks 3rd and FNDB 10th of 10 funds in the Total US Market Category.
FNDB vs SPTM
SPTM −0.22pt a year
0.25%0.03%
SPTM 1.4×the volume
323K468K
SPTM +0.7pt
+14.4%+15.1%
FNDB vs SPTM Performance
+85.4%+73.4%
- FNDB 0.25%
- SPTM 0.03%, better
- FNDB $1.51B
- SPTM $14.3B
- FNDB +24.4%, better
- SPTM +12.4%
- FNDB 1.42%, better
- SPTM 1.07%
- FNDB 1616
- SPTM 1511
- FNDB 323K sh
- SPTM 468K sh, better
- FNDB $31.77
- SPTM $93.14
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FNDB | SPTM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F11 | A75Higher |
| Mission | A74 | A100Higher |
| Risk | B66Higher | B57 |
| Tradability | C42 | B69Higher |
| Holdings | A85Higher | C49 |
| Durability | D33 | B63Higher |
Rank among Total US Market funds
Same Category. FNDB and SPTM are both graded against the same 10 Total US Market funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FNDBC
SPTMA
In short
FNDB Most total-market funds let share prices decide who's biggest. FNDB uses a different scoreboard: roughly 1,600 US companies weighted by fundamental measures of size, not market value.
SPTM One ticker for the whole US market ladder: about 1,500 large, mid and small caps from S&P's composite index at 3 basis points. Running since 2000, at half the fee of the typical total-market rival.
Stated mandate
FNDB The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of an index covering U.S. companies and weighting them according to fundamental measures of size.
SPTM The fund seeks to provide investment results that generally correspond to the total return of the S&P Composite 1500 Index, offering broad U.S. equity exposure across market capitalizations.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FNDB vs SPTM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FNDB vs SPTM Cost
Overpaying FNDB vs SPTM
$4,521
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FNDB 0.25%
$5,159
SPTM 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FNDB | SPTM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $455 | $55 | $400 |
| 20 | $1,769 | $216 | $1,553 |
| 30 | $5,159 | $638 | $4,521 |
- 0.25%FNDB
- 0.03%SPTM, cheaper
- Middle half of Total US Market funds
- Median 0.04%
SPTM 2nd cheapest of 10 funds
FNDB 10th cheapest of 10 funds
FNDB vs SPTM Dividends
- FNDB 1.42%, better
- SPTM 1.07%
- FNDB $0.45
- SPTM $0.98
- FNDB $0.12
- SPTM $0.25
- FNDB Sep 23, 2026
- SPTM Sep 21, 2026
- FNDB Sep 28, 2026
- SPTM Sep 23, 2026
- FNDB Quarterly
- SPTM Quarterly
Distribution history
FNDB vs SPTM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FNDB
- SPTM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FNDB 11.7%, betterSPTM 12.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- FNDB 1.48, betterSPTM 1.39
- Worst fall
- FNDB −19.3%, betterSPTM −24.2%
- Market sensitivity
- FNDB 0.89SPTM 1.01
FNDB and SPTM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.25% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
