PEMX ranks 4th and BCEM 5th of 9 funds in the Emerging Markets Active Growth Category.
BCEM vs PEMX
PEMX −0.10pt a year
0.80%0.70%
BCEM 5.3×the volume
7.51K1.41K
BCEM vs PEMX Performance
−8.6%−4.9%
- BCEM 0.80%
- PEMX 0.70%, better
- BCEM $49M
- PEMX $30M
- BCEM
- PEMX +23.2%
- BCEM
- PEMX 5.83%
- BCEM 80
- PEMX 55
- BCEM 7.51K sh, better
- PEMX 1.41K sh
- BCEM $23.89
- PEMX $78.33
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BCEM | PEMX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D37 | B58Higher |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | D30 | C52Higher |
| Tradability | C40Higher | F19 |
| Holdings | B66Higher | C43 |
| Durability | C52 | B63Higher |
Rank among Emerging Markets Active Growth funds
Same Category. BCEM and PEMX are both graded against the same 9 Emerging Markets Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BCEMC
PEMXC
In short
BCEM Baron took its 44-year growth-stock playbook into emerging markets and put it in an ETF: founder-led, capital-efficient companies of any size, run by the manager who has led Baron's EM strategy since 2011.
PEMX China swamps most emerging-market funds. PEMX cuts it out entirely and runs an active, roughly 60-stock book across the rest of the developing world, priced well below the typical active EM manager.
Stated mandate
BCEM The Fund seeks capital appreciation.
PEMX The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation. It invests primarily in emerging-market common stocks outside China and Hong Kong, using active fundamental research to identify companies with favorable investment potential.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BCEM vs PEMX Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BCEM vs PEMX Cost
Overpaying BCEM vs PEMX
$1,740
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BCEM 0.80%
$15,346
PEMX 0.70%
$13,606
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BCEM | PEMX | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,422 | $1,250 | $172 |
| 20 | $5,393 | $4,760 | $633 |
| 30 | $15,346 | $13,606 | $1,740 |
- 0.80%BCEM
- 0.70%PEMX, cheaper
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Active Growth funds
- Median 0.79%
PEMX 4th cheapest of 9 funds
BCEM 6th cheapest of 9 funds
BCEM vs PEMX Dividends
- BCEM
- PEMX 5.83%
- BCEM None
- PEMX $4.50
- BCEM
- PEMX $4.50
- BCEM
- PEMX Dec 19, 2025
- BCEM
- PEMX Dec 23, 2025
- BCEM
- PEMX Annual
Distribution history
BCEM vs PEMX Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BCEM PEMX 19.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- BCEM PEMX 1.21
- Worst fall
- BCEM PEMX −19.0%
- Market sensitivity
- BCEM 1.26PEMX 1.18
BCEM and PEMX in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.80% · 0.64%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.64%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.66%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.66%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
