Skip to content
etf.net

BCGD vs ETFT

Baron Global Durable Advantage ETF

BCGDCNYSE

Fundsmith Equity ETF

ETFTDNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

BCGD −0.25pt a year

BCGD0.75%ETFT1.00%

Avg volume · 30D

ETFT 1.1×the volume

BCGD2.04KETFT2.14K

BCGD vs ETFT Performance

Dec 31, 2025 – Nov 2, 2026

+2.6%BCGD+4.6%ETFT

Dec 31, 2025 to Nov 2, 2026. BCGD +2.6%. ETFT +4.6%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−10%−5%0%Dec 2025Jun 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
BCGD 0.75%, better
ETFT 1.00%
Fund size
BCGD $10M
ETFT $8M
Holdings
BCGD 41
ETFT 30
Avg volume (30D)
BCGD 2.04K sh
ETFT 2.14K sh, better
NAV per share
BCGD $25.97
ETFT $10.27
52W range

ETF.net Grade

BCGD: Cost 52, Risk 32, Mission not scored, Tradability 32, Holdings 57, Durability 39. ETFT: Cost 12, Risk 35, Mission not scored, Tradability 32, Holdings 46, Durability 26.
Pillar letters and Scores for BCGD, ETFT, with each pillar’s weight
PillarBCGDETFT
Cost30% weightC52HigherF12
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightD32D35Higher
Tradability15% weightD32D32
Holdings10% weightB57HigherC46
Durability5% weightD39HigherD26

Rank among Global Active Quality / Moat funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. BCGD and ETFT are both graded against the same 5 Global Active Quality / Moat funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Global Active Quality / Moat⁠

Category · 5 funds
See all 5 ›

BCGD ranks 4th and ETFT 5th of 5 funds in the Global Active Quality / Moat Category.

  1. Rank 1BFITZFitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETFScore 63
  2. Rank 2BMOTGVanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETFScore 62
  3. Rank 3CSQSSapient Quality Select ETFScore 44
  4. Rank 4CBCGDBaron Global Durable Advantage ETFScore 43
  5. Rank 5DETFTFundsmith Equity ETFScore 26

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

BCGDCBaron Global Durable Advantage ETF

ETFTDFundsmith Equity ETF

In short

BCGD No data

ETFT A global quality-growth stockpicker in an ETF wrapper, live since late 2025: profitable, growing companies of any size, anywhere, with at least 80% of assets in equities.

Stated mandate

BCGD No data

ETFT The Fund seeks long-term growth by investing globally in listed equities, with at least 80% of net assets normally in equity securities and a primary focus on common stocks of U.S. and non-U.S. companies of any size.

Why people hold it

BCGD No data

  • ETFT Tight, legible mandate: US and non-US common stocks of any size, chosen on growth, profitability and quality rather than index weights.
  • Genuinely global and size-agnostic. No country sleeves, no market-cap box, just one portfolio of businesses.
  • Aimed at long-term growth rather than income, so the work is done by the companies it owns instead of a payout schedule.

Worth knowing

BCGD No data

  • ETFT The fee is 1.00% a year, at the pricier end of this peer group. Cheaper active global growth exists, such as CGGO at 0.47%.
  • Launched in late 2025, so there is very little live record to judge, and our review currently places it in the lower half of its cohort.
  • Still a small, thinly traded fund, which typically means wider bid-ask spreads than the heavily traded names in the category.

Full BCGD profile⁠

Full ETFT profile⁠

BCGD vs ETFT Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

BCGD vs ETFT Cost

Overpaying ETFT vs BCGD

$4,206

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • BCGD 0.75%

    $14,482

  • ETFT 1.00%

    $18,688

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • BCGD 0.75%
  • ETFT 1.00%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530ETFT $18,688BCGD $14,482

Year by year

YearBCGDETFTOverpaying
10$1,336$1,763$427
20$5,078$6,625$1,547
30$14,482$18,688$4,206

Expense ratio

  • 0.75%BCGD, cheaper
  • 1.00%ETFT
  • Middle half of Global Active Quality / Moat funds
  • Median 0.75%

BCGD 2nd cheapest of 5 funds

ETFT 5th cheapest of 5 funds

BCGD vs ETFT Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Payout (12M)
BCGD None
ETFT None

Distribution history

BCGDAll BCGD payments⁠

No distribution history available.

ETFTAll ETFT payments⁠

No distribution history available.

BCGD vs ETFT Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
BCGD 1.08ETFT 1.00

Popular comparisons

  • BCGDCvsFITZB

    Baron Global Durable Advantage ETF · Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.75%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • ETFTDvsFITZB

    Fundsmith Equity ETF · Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.00% · 0.75%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • BCGDCvsMOTGB

    Baron Global Durable Advantage ETF · VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.52%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • ETFTDvsMOTGB

    Fundsmith Equity ETF · VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.00% · 0.52%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • BCGDCvsSQSC

    Baron Global Durable Advantage ETF · Sapient Quality Select ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.80%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • ETFTDvsSQSC

    Fundsmith Equity ETF · Sapient Quality Select ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.00% · 0.80%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.