NCIQ ranks 2nd and BESO 7th of 10 funds in the Spot Crypto Basket Category.
BESO vs NCIQ
0.0%by weight
NCIQ −0.75pt a year
1.00%0.25%
NCIQ 168.0×the volume
29048.7K
BESO vs NCIQ Performance
+25.1%+22.3%
- BESO 1.00%
- NCIQ 0.25%, better
- BESO $10M
- NCIQ $447M
- BESO
- NCIQ −34.1%
- BESO 4
- NCIQ 10
- BESO 290 sh
- NCIQ 48.7K sh, better
- BESO $31.33
- NCIQ $19.19
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BESO | NCIQ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F24 | A75Higher |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | A86Higher | D35 |
| Tradability | C43 | C54Higher |
| Holdings | B64 | |
| Durability | D36 | B68Higher |
Rank among Spot Crypto Basket funds
Same Category. BESO and NCIQ are both graded against the same 10 Spot Crypto Basket funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BESOC
NCIQA
In short
BESO Three coins, one ticker. BESO holds Bitcoin, Ethereum and Solana inside a 1940 Act fund whose stated goal pairs capital appreciation with current income, while much of the field tracks broader crypto indexes.
NCIQ A passive basket of the digital assets in a Nasdaq index, run at 0.25% a year while the typical multi-coin crypto fund charges more than double that. It tracks the index and makes no attempt to beat it.
Stated mandate
BESO The Fund seeks capital appreciation and current income.
NCIQ The Trust seeks to match the daily price changes of its reference index, after expenses and liabilities, by investing in the index's digital-asset constituents. It uses a passive strategy and does not seek to outperform the index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BESO vs NCIQ Holdings
How BESO and NCIQ differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of BESO and 0.0% of NCIQ.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for BESO and NCIQ.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
No country split for NCIQ.
Concentration
- BESO100.1%
- NCIQ100.0%
- BESO4
- NCIQ8
Asset class
- BESO
- Alternatives
- NCIQ
- Alternatives
Holdings
- Only in BESO4
- In both0
- Only in NCIQ8
Only in BESO
4 securities, 100% of BESO by weight
- Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF40.12%
- iShares Staked Ethereum Trust ETF36.94%
- Bitwise Solana Staking ETF22.36%
- First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/20310.67%
Only in NCIQ
8 securities, 99.7% of NCIQ by weight
- Bitcoin75.10%
- Ethereum11.14%
- Ripple4.86%
- Hyperliquid3.78%
- Solana3.62%
- Cardano0.45%
- Chainlink0.43%
- Stellar0.30%
Weight gaps
BESO and NCIQ share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BESO vs NCIQ Cost
Overpaying BESO vs NCIQ
$13,529
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BESO 1.00%
$18,688
NCIQ 0.25%
$5,159
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BESO | NCIQ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,763 | $455 | $1,308 |
| 20 | $6,625 | $1,769 | $4,856 |
| 30 | $18,688 | $5,159 | $13,529 |
- 1.00%BESO
- 0.25%NCIQ, cheaper
- Middle half of Spot Crypto Basket funds
- Median 0.67%
NCIQ 3rd cheapest of 10 funds
BESO 8th cheapest of 10 funds
BESO vs NCIQ Dividends
- BESO None
- NCIQ None
Distribution history
BESO vs NCIQ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BESO NCIQ 43.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- BESO NCIQ −0.06
- Worst fall
- BESO NCIQ −57.0%
- Market sensitivity
- BESO −1.55NCIQ 1.09
BESO and NCIQ in the news
Popular comparisons
- 1.00% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
