Skip to content

GDLC vs NCIQ

Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF

GDLCANYSE Arca

Hashdex Nasdaq Crypto Index US ETF

NCIQANasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

NCIQ −0.34pt a year

GDLC0.59%NCIQ0.25%

Avg volume · 30D

NCIQ 1.4×the volume

GDLC35.8KNCIQ48.7K

GDLC vs NCIQ Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

−34.9%GDLC−34.1%NCIQ

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. GDLC −34.9%. NCIQ −34.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−50%−20%−10%0%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
GDLC 0.59%
NCIQ 0.25%, better
Fund size
GDLC $390M
NCIQ $447M
1Y total return
GDLC −34.9%
NCIQ −34.1%, better
Holdings
GDLC 5
NCIQ 10
Avg volume (30D)
GDLC 35.8K sh
NCIQ 48.7K sh, better
NAV per share
GDLC $34.58
NCIQ $19.19
52W range

ETF.net Grade

GDLC: Cost 58, Risk 35, Mission 100, Tradability 83, Holdings not scored, Durability 75. NCIQ: Cost 75, Risk 35, Mission 100, Tradability 54, Holdings not scored, Durability 68.
Pillar letters and Scores for GDLC, NCIQ, with each pillar’s weight
PillarGDLCNCIQ
Cost30% weightB58A75Higher
Mission25% weightA100A100
Risk15% weightD35D35
Tradability15% weightA83HigherC54
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightA75HigherB68

Rank among Spot Crypto Basket funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. GDLC and NCIQ are both graded against the same 10 Spot Crypto Basket funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Spot Crypto Basket⁠

Category · 10 funds
See all 10 ›

GDLC ranks 2nd and NCIQ 2nd of 10 funds in the Spot Crypto Basket Category.

  1. Rank 1AEZPZFranklin Crypto Index ETFScore 76
  2. Rank 2AGDLCGrayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETFScore 71
  3. Rank 2ANCIQHashdex Nasdaq Crypto Index US ETFScore 71
  4. Rank 4BBITWBitwise 10 Crypto Index ETFScore 63

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

GDLCAGrayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF

NCIQAHashdex Nasdaq Crypto Index US ETF

In short

GDLC One ticker, five large liquid coins, market-cap weighted by the CoinDesk 5 Index. Grayscale's 2018-vintage basket predates the spot-crypto ETF crowd, and its fee now sits right at the middle of that pack.

NCIQ A passive basket of the digital assets in a Nasdaq index, run at 0.25% a year while the typical multi-coin crypto fund charges more than double that. It tracks the index and makes no attempt to beat it.

Stated mandate

GDLC The fund provides exposure to the market-cap-weighted performance of five large, liquid crypto assets, offering diversified access to the cryptocurrency market.

NCIQ The Trust seeks to match the daily price changes of its reference index, after expenses and liabilities, by investing in the index's digital-asset constituents. It uses a passive strategy and does not seek to outperform the index.

Why people hold it

  • GDLC Five large, liquid coins in a single market-cap-weighted basket tracking the CoinDesk 5 Index. No exchange accounts, no wallets, no seed phrases.
  • At 0.59% a year it lands at the median for multi-coin baskets, and far under the 2.50% Bitwise charges on BITW.
  • Running since 2018, one of the longest histories among multi-coin crypto funds, and it stands in the upper half of that group.
  • The mandate is literal: hold the index's five names at market-cap weight. No manager hunting the next winner.
  • NCIQ Charges 0.25% a year, well under half the 0.59% median for multi-coin crypto baskets such as GDLC and KRYP.
  • Narrow, literal mandate: match the daily moves of the Nasdaq CME Crypto Settlement Price Index after expenses, no outperformance attempt. It has hewed closely to that job.
  • One ticker buys the whole index basket, so no exchange accounts, wallets or self-custody to manage.

Worth knowing

  • GDLC Trades lightly for its category, so spreads can run wider than the headline crypto funds. Limit orders earn their keep here.
  • Five coins at market-cap weight means the largest one carries most of the load. This is concentrated crypto exposure, and it moves like it.
  • Cheaper doors to the same basket idea exist: EZPZ at 0.00% and NCIQ at 0.25%. And there is no income here, only coin prices.
  • NCIQ Structured as a trust rather than a registered fund, so the protections investors get under the Investment Company Act do not apply here.
  • Generally pays no cash distributions, so any return has to come from price moves alone.
  • Crypto prices swing hard, and with a January 2025 launch the live track record is still short.

Full GDLC profile⁠

Full NCIQ profile⁠

GDLC vs NCIQ Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

GDLC vs NCIQ Cost

Overpaying GDLC vs NCIQ

$6,476

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • GDLC 0.59%

    $11,635

  • NCIQ 0.25%

    $5,159

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • GDLC 0.59%
  • NCIQ 0.25%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530GDLC $11,635NCIQ $5,159

Year by year

YearGDLCNCIQOverpaying
10$1,058$455$603
20$4,051$1,769$2,282
30$11,635$5,159$6,476

Expense ratio

  • 0.59%GDLC
  • 0.25%NCIQ, cheaper
  • Middle half of Spot Crypto Basket funds
  • Median 0.67%

NCIQ 3rd cheapest of 10 funds

GDLC 5th cheapest of 10 funds

GDLC vs NCIQ Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
GDLC None
NCIQ None

Distribution history

GDLCAll GDLC payments⁠

No distribution history available.

NCIQAll NCIQ payments⁠

No distribution history available.

GDLC vs NCIQ Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
GDLC 70.1%NCIQ 43.2%since Mar 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
GDLC 0.73NCIQ −0.06since Mar 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
GDLC −89.0%NCIQ −57.0%since Feb 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
GDLC 2.44NCIQ 1.09

GDLC and NCIQ in the news

Popular comparisons

  • GDLCAvsEZPZA

    Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF · Franklin Crypto Index ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.59% · 0.19%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • NCIQAvsEZPZA

    Hashdex Nasdaq Crypto Index US ETF · Franklin Crypto Index ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.19%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GDLCAvsBITWB

    Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF · Bitwise 10 Crypto Index ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.59% · 0.75%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • NCIQAvsBITWB

    Hashdex Nasdaq Crypto Index US ETF · Bitwise 10 Crypto Index ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.75%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GDLCAvsVAVXB

    Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF · VanEck Avalanche ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.59% · 0.20%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • NCIQAvsVAVXB

    Hashdex Nasdaq Crypto Index US ETF · VanEck Avalanche ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.20%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.