NCIQ ranks 2nd and BITW 4th of 10 funds in the Spot Crypto Basket Category.
BITW vs NCIQ
NCIQ −0.50pt a year
0.75%0.25%
NCIQ 1.5×the volume
31.6K48.7K
BITW vs NCIQ Performance
−34.1%−34.1%
- BITW 0.75%
- NCIQ 0.25%, better
- BITW $663M
- NCIQ $447M
- BITW −34.1%
- NCIQ −34.1%
- BITW 10
- NCIQ 10
- BITW 31.6K sh
- NCIQ 48.7K sh, better
- BITW $51.89
- NCIQ $19.19
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BITW | NCIQ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C44 | A75Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | D32 | D35Higher |
| Tradability | A73Higher | C54 |
| Holdings | C54 | |
| Durability | A80Higher | B68 |
Rank among Spot Crypto Basket funds
Same Category. BITW and NCIQ are both graded against the same 10 Spot Crypto Basket funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BITWB
NCIQA
In short
BITW Crypto's original index fund. Live since 2017, first as a private placement and now as an ETF, it holds the ten largest crypto assets and rebalances monthly. That long history carries a 0.75% fee.
NCIQ A passive basket of the digital assets in a Nasdaq index, run at 0.25% a year while the typical multi-coin crypto fund charges more than double that. It tracks the index and makes no attempt to beat it.
Stated mandate
BITW The fund seeks to invest in a broad portfolio of crypto assets that tracks the Bitwise 10 Large Cap Crypto Index, with monthly rebalancing to reflect index changes.
NCIQ The Trust seeks to match the daily price changes of its reference index, after expenses and liabilities, by investing in the index's digital-asset constituents. It uses a passive strategy and does not seek to outperform the index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BITW vs NCIQ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BITW vs NCIQ Cost
Overpaying BITW vs NCIQ
$9,323
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BITW 0.75%
$14,482
NCIQ 0.25%
$5,159
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BITW | NCIQ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,336 | $455 | $881 |
| 20 | $5,078 | $1,769 | $3,309 |
| 30 | $14,482 | $5,159 | $9,323 |
- 0.75%BITW
- 0.25%NCIQ, cheaper
- Middle half of Spot Crypto Basket funds
- Median 0.67%
NCIQ 3rd cheapest of 10 funds
BITW 6th cheapest of 10 funds
BITW vs NCIQ Dividends
- BITW None
- NCIQ None
Distribution history
BITW vs NCIQ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BITW 66.6%NCIQ 43.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- BITW 0.74NCIQ −0.06
- Worst fall
- BITW −90.4%NCIQ −57.0%
- Market sensitivity
- BITW 2.49NCIQ 1.09
BITW and NCIQ in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.75% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

