Skip to content

BITW vs NCIQ

Bitwise 10 Crypto Index ETF

BITWBNYSE Arca

Hashdex Nasdaq Crypto Index US ETF

NCIQANasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

NCIQ −0.50pt a year

BITW0.75%NCIQ0.25%

Avg volume · 30D

NCIQ 1.5×the volume

BITW31.6KNCIQ48.7K

BITW vs NCIQ Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

−34.1%BITW−34.1%NCIQ

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. BITW −34.1%. NCIQ −34.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−50%−20%−10%0%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
BITW 0.75%
NCIQ 0.25%, better
Fund size
BITW $663M
NCIQ $447M
1Y total return
BITW −34.1%
NCIQ −34.1%
Holdings
BITW 10
NCIQ 10
Avg volume (30D)
BITW 31.6K sh
NCIQ 48.7K sh, better
NAV per share
BITW $51.89
NCIQ $19.19
52W range

ETF.net Grade

BITW: Cost 44, Risk 32, Mission 100, Tradability 73, Holdings 54, Durability 80. NCIQ: Cost 75, Risk 35, Mission 100, Tradability 54, Holdings not scored, Durability 68.
Pillar letters and Scores for BITW, NCIQ, with each pillar’s weight
PillarBITWNCIQ
Cost30% weightC44A75Higher
Mission25% weightA100A100
Risk15% weightD32D35Higher
Tradability15% weightA73HigherC54
Holdings10% weightC54Not scored
Durability5% weightA80HigherB68

Rank among Spot Crypto Basket funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. BITW and NCIQ are both graded against the same 10 Spot Crypto Basket funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Spot Crypto Basket⁠

Category · 10 funds
See all 10 ›

NCIQ ranks 2nd and BITW 4th of 10 funds in the Spot Crypto Basket Category.

  1. Rank 1AEZPZFranklin Crypto Index ETFScore 76
  2. Rank 2AGDLCGrayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETFScore 71
  3. Rank 2ANCIQHashdex Nasdaq Crypto Index US ETFScore 71
  4. Rank 4BBITWBitwise 10 Crypto Index ETFScore 63
  5. Rank 5BVAVXVanEck Avalanche ETFScore 62

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

BITWBBitwise 10 Crypto Index ETF

NCIQAHashdex Nasdaq Crypto Index US ETF

In short

BITW Crypto's original index fund. Live since 2017, first as a private placement and now as an ETF, it holds the ten largest crypto assets and rebalances monthly. That long history carries a 0.75% fee.

NCIQ A passive basket of the digital assets in a Nasdaq index, run at 0.25% a year while the typical multi-coin crypto fund charges more than double that. It tracks the index and makes no attempt to beat it.

Stated mandate

BITW The fund seeks to invest in a broad portfolio of crypto assets that tracks the Bitwise 10 Large Cap Crypto Index, with monthly rebalancing to reflect index changes.

NCIQ The Trust seeks to match the daily price changes of its reference index, after expenses and liabilities, by investing in the index's digital-asset constituents. It uses a passive strategy and does not seek to outperform the index.

Why people hold it

  • BITW Longevity is the edge: operations began in November 2017, one of the longest continuous records among multi-coin crypto baskets, spanning several boom-and-bust cycles.sec.gov
  • One ticker, ten coins: the portfolio mirrors the Bitwise 10 Large Cap Crypto Index and rebalances monthly as the index changes, so you skip wallets, keys and coin-picking.
  • No style drift. The fund holds what its index says it holds, one of the tighter mandate implementations among the ten funds in its category.
  • Reports like a public company: annual 10-K and quarterly 10-Q filings with the SEC put holdings and audited financials on the record.sec.govsec.gov 2
  • NCIQ Charges 0.25% a year, well under half the 0.59% median for multi-coin crypto baskets such as GDLC and KRYP.
  • Narrow, literal mandate: match the daily moves of the Nasdaq CME Crypto Settlement Price Index after expenses, no outperformance attempt. It has hewed closely to that job.
  • One ticker buys the whole index basket, so no exchange accounts, wallets or self-custody to manage.

Worth knowing

  • BITW Cost is the trade-off: 0.75% sits above the category median, and cheaper broad crypto baskets exist (EZPZ at 0.19%, NCIQ at 0.25%).
  • Crypto sits at the volatile end of the shelf. A ten-asset basket blunts single-coin blowups, but not the asset class's deep drawdowns.
  • It trades lighter than the category's busiest names, so spreads can run wider, and the trust makes no distributions: price is the whole return story.
  • NCIQ Structured as a trust rather than a registered fund, so the protections investors get under the Investment Company Act do not apply here.
  • Generally pays no cash distributions, so any return has to come from price moves alone.
  • Crypto prices swing hard, and with a January 2025 launch the live track record is still short.

Full BITW profile⁠

Full NCIQ profile⁠

BITW vs NCIQ Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

BITW vs NCIQ Cost

Overpaying BITW vs NCIQ

$9,323

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • BITW 0.75%

    $14,482

  • NCIQ 0.25%

    $5,159

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • BITW 0.75%
  • NCIQ 0.25%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530BITW $14,482NCIQ $5,159

Year by year

YearBITWNCIQOverpaying
10$1,336$455$881
20$5,078$1,769$3,309
30$14,482$5,159$9,323

Expense ratio

  • 0.75%BITW
  • 0.25%NCIQ, cheaper
  • Middle half of Spot Crypto Basket funds
  • Median 0.67%

NCIQ 3rd cheapest of 10 funds

BITW 6th cheapest of 10 funds

BITW vs NCIQ Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
BITW None
NCIQ None

Distribution history

BITWAll BITW payments⁠

No distribution history available.

NCIQAll NCIQ payments⁠

No distribution history available.

BITW vs NCIQ Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
BITW 66.6%NCIQ 43.2%since Mar 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
BITW 0.74NCIQ −0.06since Mar 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
BITW −90.4%NCIQ −57.0%since Feb 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
BITW 2.49NCIQ 1.09

BITW and NCIQ in the news

Popular comparisons

  • BITWBvsEZPZA

    Bitwise 10 Crypto Index ETF · Franklin Crypto Index ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.19%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • NCIQAvsEZPZA

    Hashdex Nasdaq Crypto Index US ETF · Franklin Crypto Index ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.19%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BITWBvsGDLCA

    Bitwise 10 Crypto Index ETF · Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • NCIQAvsGDLCA

    Hashdex Nasdaq Crypto Index US ETF · Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BITWBvsVAVXB

    Bitwise 10 Crypto Index ETF · VanEck Avalanche ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.20%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • NCIQAvsVAVXB

    Hashdex Nasdaq Crypto Index US ETF · VanEck Avalanche ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.20%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.