WLTG ranks 2nd and BGGG 4th of 8 funds in the Global Active Growth Category.
BGGG vs WLTG
BGGG −0.04pt a year
0.70%0.74%
BGGG 4.5×the volume
42.5K9.39K
BGGG vs WLTG Performance
−9.3%+0.1%
- BGGG 0.70%, better
- WLTG 0.74%
- BGGG $258M
- WLTG $77M
- BGGG
- WLTG +10.5%
- BGGG
- WLTG 4.09%
- BGGG 38
- WLTG 41
- BGGG 42.5K sh, better
- WLTG 9.39K sh
- BGGG $32.76
- WLTG $38.18
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BGGG | WLTG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B68Higher | B57 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | F19 | B61Higher |
| Tradability | B57 | B61Higher |
| Holdings | D38 | C46Higher |
| Durability | C42 | C51Higher |
Rank among Global Active Growth funds
Same Category. BGGG and WLTG are both graded against the same 8 Global Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BGGGC
WLTGB
In short
BGGG Baillie Gifford's flagship concentrated global growth strategy in an ETF wrapper: roughly 40 businesses picked by bottom-up research, index weights ignored. The firm's long-running mutual fund version was reorganized into this ETF in 2026.
WLTG A growth fund with an escape hatch. Three quarters is a concentrated book of 25 to 35 large-cap names; the rest follows a trend model that can rotate into gold, Treasuries, cash or an inverse ETF when the signal turns negative.
Stated mandate
BGGG The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation by actively managing a global portfolio of common stocks and other equity securities. Its managers use bottom-up company research to select businesses with attractive long-term growth prospects without regard to index geographic, industry, sector, or issuer weights.
WLTG The Fund seeks long-term capital growth and has a secondary objective of providing dividend income.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BGGG vs WLTG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BGGG vs WLTG Cost
Overpaying WLTG vs BGGG
$701
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BGGG 0.70%
$13,606
WLTG 0.74%
$14,307
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BGGG | WLTG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,250 | $1,319 | $69 |
| 20 | $4,760 | $5,015 | $255 |
| 30 | $13,606 | $14,307 | $701 |
- 0.70%BGGG, cheaper
- 0.74%WLTG
- Middle half of Global Active Growth funds
- Median 0.79%
BGGG 2nd cheapest of 8 funds
WLTG 3rd cheapest of 8 funds
BGGG vs WLTG Dividends
- BGGG
- WLTG 4.09%
- BGGG None
- WLTG $1.54
- BGGG
- WLTG $1.54
- BGGG
- WLTG Dec 24, 2025
- BGGG
- WLTG Dec 26, 2025
- BGGG
- WLTG Annual
Distribution history
BGGG vs WLTG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BGGG WLTG 12.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- BGGG WLTG 1.47
- Worst fall
- BGGG WLTG −25.1%
- Market sensitivity
- BGGG 1.34WLTG 0.90
Popular comparisons
- 0.70% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.