CGGO ranks 1st and BGGG 4th of 8 funds in the Global Active Growth Category.
BGGG vs CGGO
CGGO −0.23pt a year
0.70%0.47%
CGGO 28.3×the volume
42.5K1.2M
BGGG vs CGGO Performance
−9.3%−5.1%
- BGGG 0.70%
- CGGO 0.47%, better
- BGGG $258M
- CGGO $11.9B
- BGGG
- CGGO +8.6%
- BGGG
- CGGO 1.06%
- BGGG 38
- CGGO 108
- BGGG 42.5K sh
- CGGO 1.2M sh, better
- BGGG $32.76
- CGGO $37.50
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BGGG | CGGO |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B68 | A91Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | F19 | D35Higher |
| Tradability | B57 | B63Higher |
| Holdings | D38 | A77Higher |
| Durability | C42 | A84Higher |
Rank among Global Active Growth funds
Same Category. BGGG and CGGO are both graded against the same 8 Global Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BGGGC
CGGOA
In short
BGGG Baillie Gifford's flagship concentrated global growth strategy in an ETF wrapper: roughly 40 businesses picked by bottom-up research, index weights ignored. The firm's long-running mutual fund version was reorganized into this ETF in 2026.
CGGO Capital Group's global stock-pickers, wrapped in an ETF: about 100 growth companies picked one at a time, at home and abroad, for 0.47% when the typical active rival in its group charges 0.85%.
Stated mandate
BGGG The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation by actively managing a global portfolio of common stocks and other equity securities. Its managers use bottom-up company research to select businesses with attractive long-term growth prospects without regard to index geographic, industry, sector, or issuer weights.
CGGO The fund seeks long-term growth of capital by investing primarily in common stocks and cash or money market instruments. Its strategy emphasizes companies with significant growth potential using a bottom-up analysis.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BGGG vs CGGO Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BGGG vs CGGO Cost
Overpaying BGGG vs CGGO
$4,188
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BGGG 0.70%
$13,606
CGGO 0.47%
$9,418
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BGGG | CGGO | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,250 | $847 | $403 |
| 20 | $4,760 | $3,261 | $1,499 |
| 30 | $13,606 | $9,418 | $4,188 |
- 0.70%BGGG
- 0.47%CGGO, cheaper
- Middle half of Global Active Growth funds
- Median 0.79%
CGGO cheapest of 8 funds
BGGG 2nd cheapest of 8 funds
BGGG vs CGGO Dividends
- BGGG
- CGGO 1.06%
- BGGG None
- CGGO $0.40
- BGGG
- CGGO $0.40
- BGGG
- CGGO Dec 26, 2025
- BGGG
- CGGO Dec 29, 2025
- BGGG
- CGGO Twice a year
Distribution history
BGGG vs CGGO Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BGGG CGGO 15.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- BGGG CGGO 0.95
- Worst fall
- BGGG CGGO −24.9%
- Market sensitivity
- BGGG 1.34CGGO 1.14
BGGG and CGGO in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.70% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.47% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.47% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.47% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
