CGGO ranks 1st and WLTG 2nd of 8 funds in the Global Active Growth Category.
CGGO vs WLTG
CGGO −0.27pt a year
0.47%0.74%
CGGO 128.0×the volume
1.2M9.39K
WLTG +3.8pt
+19.9%+23.7%
CGGO vs WLTG Performance
+8.6%+10.5%
- CGGO 0.47%, better
- WLTG 0.74%
- CGGO $11.9B
- WLTG $77M
- CGGO +8.6%
- WLTG +10.5%, better
- CGGO 1.06%
- WLTG 4.09%, better
- CGGO 108
- WLTG 41
- CGGO 1.2M sh, better
- WLTG 9.39K sh
- CGGO $37.50
- WLTG $38.18
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CGGO | WLTG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A91Higher | B57 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | D35 | B61Higher |
| Tradability | B63Higher | B61 |
| Holdings | A77Higher | C46 |
| Durability | A84Higher | C51 |
Rank among Global Active Growth funds
Same Category. CGGO and WLTG are both graded against the same 8 Global Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CGGOA
WLTGB
In short
CGGO Capital Group's global stock-pickers, wrapped in an ETF: about 100 growth companies picked one at a time, at home and abroad, for 0.47% when the typical active rival in its group charges 0.85%.
WLTG A growth fund with an escape hatch. Three quarters is a concentrated book of 25 to 35 large-cap names; the rest follows a trend model that can rotate into gold, Treasuries, cash or an inverse ETF when the signal turns negative.
Stated mandate
CGGO The fund seeks long-term growth of capital by investing primarily in common stocks and cash or money market instruments. Its strategy emphasizes companies with significant growth potential using a bottom-up analysis.
WLTG The Fund seeks long-term capital growth and has a secondary objective of providing dividend income.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CGGO vs WLTG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CGGO vs WLTG Cost
Overpaying WLTG vs CGGO
$4,889
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CGGO 0.47%
$9,418
WLTG 0.74%
$14,307
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CGGO | WLTG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $847 | $1,319 | $472 |
| 20 | $3,261 | $5,015 | $1,754 |
| 30 | $9,418 | $14,307 | $4,889 |
- 0.47%CGGO, cheaper
- 0.74%WLTG
- Middle half of Global Active Growth funds
- Median 0.79%
CGGO cheapest of 8 funds
WLTG 3rd cheapest of 8 funds
CGGO vs WLTG Dividends
- CGGO 1.06%
- WLTG 4.09%, better
- CGGO $0.40
- WLTG $1.54
- CGGO $0.40
- WLTG $1.54
- CGGO Dec 26, 2025
- WLTG Dec 24, 2025
- CGGO Dec 29, 2025
- WLTG Dec 26, 2025
- CGGO Twice a year
- WLTG Annual
Distribution history
CGGO vs WLTG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CGGO 15.7%WLTG 12.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- CGGO 0.95WLTG 1.47, better
- Worst fall
- CGGO −24.9%WLTG −25.1%
- Market sensitivity
- CGGO 1.14WLTG 0.90
CGGO and WLTG in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.47% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.47% · 0.70%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.70%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.47% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
