GUSE ranks 2nd and BGRO 54th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
BGRO vs GUSE
GUSE −0.25pt a year
0.55%0.30%
GUSE 28.6×the volume
87124.9K
BGRO vs GUSE Performance
+2.3%+11.3%
- BGRO 0.55%
- GUSE 0.30%, better
- BGRO $9M
- GUSE $413M
- BGRO −1.3%
- GUSE
- BGRO 0.00%
- GUSE
- BGRO 46
- GUSE 122
- BGRO 871 sh
- GUSE 24.9K sh, better
- BGRO $39.90
- GUSE $45.25
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BGRO | GUSE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C47 | A97Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C43 | A94Higher |
| Tradability | D32 | C46Higher |
| Holdings | B66 | A89Higher |
| Durability | C52 | A85Higher |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. BGRO and GUSE are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BGROC
GUSEA
In short
BGRO BlackRock's active stock-pickers, unbundled: roughly 30 US large-cap growth names in one ticker instead of a sprawling index. A 2024 arrival that swaps breadth for a concentrated bet on earnings power.
GUSE Goldman's fundamental stock pickers hunting long-term growth in US companies, for 0.30% a year. The strategy dates to 2008 and charges well under the typical active US growth fund.
Stated mandate
BGRO The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through active exposure to U.S. large-cap growth equities, using a high-conviction, fundamentally driven approach focused on companies with strong growth characteristics and earnings power.
GUSE The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital by investing in companies that the Investment Adviser believes are positioned for long-term growth.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BGRO vs GUSE Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BGRO vs GUSE Cost
Overpaying BGRO vs GUSE
$4,755
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BGRO 0.55%
$10,904
GUSE 0.30%
$6,149
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BGRO | GUSE | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $988 | $545 | $443 |
| 20 | $3,790 | $2,113 | $1,677 |
| 30 | $10,904 | $6,149 | $4,755 |
- 0.55%BGRO
- 0.30%GUSE, cheaper
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
GUSE 3rd cheapest of 90 funds
BGRO 43rd cheapest of 90 funds
BGRO vs GUSE Dividends
- BGRO 0.00%
- GUSE
- BGRO None
- GUSE
- BGRO
- GUSE $0.30
- BGRO
- GUSE Dec 23, 2025
- BGRO
- GUSE Dec 30, 2025
- BGRO
- GUSE Irregular
Distribution history
BGRO vs GUSE Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BGRO 19.6%GUSE
- Return per unit of risk
- BGRO 0.38GUSE
- Worst fall
- BGRO −24.9%GUSE
- Market sensitivity
- BGRO 1.53GUSE 0.94
BGRO and GUSE in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.55% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.55% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.55% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
