GUSE ranks 2nd and FELG 4th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
FELG vs GUSE
FELG −0.12pt a year
0.18%0.30%
FELG 15.2×the volume
379K24.9K
FELG vs GUSE Performance
+1.6%+11.8%
- FELG 0.18%, better
- GUSE 0.30%
- FELG $5.78B
- GUSE $421M
- FELG −0.5%
- GUSE
- FELG 0.37%
- GUSE
- FELG 133
- GUSE 122
- FELG 379K sh, better
- GUSE 24.9K sh
- FELG $42.20
- GUSE $46.05
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FELG | GUSE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A99Higher | A97 |
| Mission | A82 | |
| Risk | C51 | A94Higher |
| Tradability | A85Higher | C46 |
| Holdings | C52 | A89Higher |
| Durability | A95Higher | A85 |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. FELG and GUSE are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FELGA
GUSEA
In short
FELG Active stock-picking on an index-fund budget. FELG charges 0.18% to tilt around the Russell 1000 Growth Index rather than copy it, running a strategy whose track record dates to 2007.
GUSE Goldman's fundamental stock pickers hunting long-term growth in US companies, for 0.30% a year. The strategy dates to 2008 and charges well under the typical active US growth fund.
Stated mandate
FELG The fund seeks capital appreciation and normally invests at least 80% of its assets in common stocks included in the Russell 1000® Growth Index.
GUSE The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital by investing in companies that the Investment Adviser believes are positioned for long-term growth.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FELG vs GUSE Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FELG vs GUSE Cost
Overpaying GUSE vs FELG
$2,400
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FELG 0.18%
$3,749
GUSE 0.30%
$6,149
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FELG | GUSE | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $328 | $545 | $217 |
| 20 | $1,281 | $2,113 | $832 |
| 30 | $3,749 | $6,149 | $2,400 |
- 0.18%FELG, cheaper
- 0.30%GUSE
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
FELG cheapest of 90 funds
GUSE 3rd cheapest of 90 funds
FELG vs GUSE Dividends
- FELG 0.37%
- GUSE
- FELG $0.16
- GUSE
- FELG $0.04
- GUSE $0.30
- FELG Sep 18, 2026
- GUSE Dec 23, 2025
- FELG Sep 22, 2026
- GUSE Dec 30, 2025
- FELG Quarterly
- GUSE Irregular
Distribution history
FELG vs GUSE Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FELG 16.3%GUSE
- Return per unit of risk
- FELG 0.93GUSE
- Worst fall
- FELG −23.9%GUSE
- Market sensitivity
- FELG 1.23GUSE 0.93
FELG and GUSE in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.18% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
