Skip to content
etf.net

BGUS vs GUSE

Baillie Gifford U.S. Equity Growth ETF

BGUSCNasdaq

Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

GUSEANasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

GUSE −0.30pt a year

BGUS0.60%GUSE0.30%

Avg volume · 30D

GUSE 4.6×the volume

BGUS5.42KGUSE24.9K

BGUS vs GUSE Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

+1.8%BGUS+0.5%GUSE

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. BGUS +1.8%. GUSE +0.5%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.4%6%8%10%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
BGUS 0.60%
GUSE 0.30%, better
Fund size
BGUS $10M
GUSE $421M
Holdings
BGUS 47
GUSE 122
Avg volume (30D)
BGUS 5.42K sh
GUSE 24.9K sh, better
NAV per share
BGUS $26.20
GUSE $46.05
52W range

ETF.net Grade

BGUS: Cost 34, Risk 76, Mission not scored, Tradability 49, Holdings 69, Durability 11. GUSE: Cost 97, Risk 94, Mission not scored, Tradability 46, Holdings 89, Durability 85.
Pillar letters and Scores for BGUS, GUSE, with each pillar’s weight
PillarBGUSGUSE
Cost30% weightD34A97Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightA76A94Higher
Tradability15% weightC49HigherC46
Holdings10% weightB69A89Higher
Durability5% weightF11A85Higher

Rank among US Active Growth funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. BGUS and GUSE are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Growth⁠

Category · 90 funds
See all 90 ›

GUSE ranks 2nd and BGUS 44th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.

  1. Rank 1AJUSAJPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETFScore 86
  2. Rank 2AGUSEGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETFScore 84
  3. Rank 3ALRGCAB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETFScore 81
  4. Rank 43CSXQGETC 6 Meridian Quality Growth ETFScore 50
  5. Rank 44CBGUSBaillie Gifford U.S. Equity Growth ETFScore 48
  6. Rank 44CCAMLCongress Large Cap Growth ETFScore 48

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

BGUSCBaillie Gifford U.S. Equity Growth ETF

GUSEAGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

In short

BGUS No data

GUSE Goldman's fundamental stock pickers hunting long-term growth in US companies, for 0.30% a year. The strategy dates to 2008 and charges well under the typical active US growth fund.

Stated mandate

BGUS No data

GUSE The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital by investing in companies that the Investment Adviser believes are positioned for long-term growth.

Why people hold it

BGUS No data

  • GUSE Charges 0.30% a year, against a 0.54% median for its active US growth cohort. Cheap, for stock picking.
  • Actively run with no index to shadow. Managers hold companies they judge positioned for long-term growth, so the portfolio can look different from a large-cap benchmark.
  • Inception dates to 2008, so the strategy has run through multiple market cycles, not one long rally.
  • One of the stronger implementations in a crowded field of active US growth funds.

Worth knowing

BGUS No data

  • GUSE Trades thinly next to the category's heavyweights. Spreads can be wider, which bites most on large or hurried orders.
  • Two peers in the same top tier undercut it on fee: JUSA at 0.12% and FELG at 0.18%. Price is not where this one stands out.
  • Distributions land once or twice a year, not monthly. Growth of capital is the stated goal, not an income stream.

Full BGUS profile⁠

Full GUSE profile⁠

BGUS vs GUSE Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

BGUS vs GUSE Cost

Overpaying BGUS vs GUSE

$5,668

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • BGUS 0.60%

    $11,817

  • GUSE 0.30%

    $6,149

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • BGUS 0.60%
  • GUSE 0.30%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530BGUS $11,817GUSE $6,149

Year by year

YearBGUSGUSEOverpaying
10$1,076$545$531
20$4,116$2,113$2,003
30$11,817$6,149$5,668

Expense ratio

  • 0.60%BGUS
  • 0.30%GUSE, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Active Growth funds
  • Median 0.55%

GUSE 3rd cheapest of 90 funds

BGUS 59th cheapest of 90 funds

BGUS vs GUSE Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
BGUS None
GUSE No data
Last payment
BGUS No data
GUSE $0.30
Ex-dividend
BGUS No data
GUSE Dec 23, 2025
Paid on
BGUS No data
GUSE Dec 30, 2025
Frequency
BGUS No data
GUSE Irregular

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

BGUSAll BGUS payments⁠

No distribution history available.

GUSEIrregular · 1 paymentAll GUSE payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Dec 23, 2025 $0.30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252026YTD

BGUS vs GUSE Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
BGUS 0.00GUSE 0.93

Popular comparisons

  • BGUSCvsJUSAA

    Baillie Gifford U.S. Equity Growth ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • GUSEAvsJUSAA

    Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • BGUSCvsLRGCA

    Baillie Gifford U.S. Equity Growth ETF · AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • GUSEAvsLRGCA

    Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF · AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • BGUSCvsFELGA

    Baillie Gifford U.S. Equity Growth ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • GUSEAvsFELGA

    Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.