DDM ranks 4th and BIB 8th of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.
BIB vs DDM
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.95%0.95%
DDM 17.7×the volume
10.5K185K
DDM +6.6pt
+12.6%+19.2%
BIB vs DDM Performance
+36.3%+68.8%
- BIB 0.95%
- DDM 0.95%
- BIB $104M
- DDM $507M
- BIB +68.9%, better
- DDM +13.4%
- BIB 0.19%
- DDM 0.98%, better
- BIB 247
- DDM 34
- BIB 10.5K sh
- DDM 185K sh, better
- BIB $120.62
- DDM $62.99
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BIB | DDM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C51 | C51 |
| Mission | A92 | |
| Risk | A70 | A79Higher |
| Tradability | A84 | A93Higher |
| Holdings | B60Higher | C53 |
| Durability | A75 | A79Higher |
Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. BIB and DDM are both graded against the same 95 Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BIBB
DDMB
In short
BIB Biotech with the dial at 2x, not 3x. Since 2010 BIB has aimed at twice the daily move of the Nasdaq Biotechnology Index, a modified cap-weighted set of Nasdaq-listed biotech and pharma names, reset fresh every single day.
DDM The Dow dates to 1896. DDM is the only ETF built to double its daily move: 2x the Dow Jones Industrial Average, reset every single day, for 0.95% a year, running since 2006.
Stated mandate
BIB The Fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to two times the daily performance of the Nasdaq Biotechnology Index.
DDM The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to twice the daily performance of the Dow Jones Industrial Average.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BIB vs DDM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BIB vs DDM Cost
Same expense ratio
$17,869
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BIB 0.95%
$17,869
DDM 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BIB | DDM |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $1,678 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $6,322 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $17,869 |
- 0.95%BIB
- 0.95%DDM
- Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
BIB 32nd cheapest of 95 funds
DDM 32nd cheapest of 95 funds
BIB vs DDM Dividends
- BIB 0.19%
- DDM 0.98%, better
- BIB $0.22
- DDM $0.62
- BIB $0.08
- DDM $0.15
- BIB Sep 23, 2026
- DDM Sep 23, 2026
- BIB Sep 29, 2026
- DDM Sep 29, 2026
- BIB Twice a year
- DDM Quarterly
Distribution history
BIB vs DDM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- BIB
- DDM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BIB 33.9%DDM 24.6%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- BIB 1.12, betterDDM 0.96
- Worst fall
- BIB −61.8%DDM −40.2%, better
- Market sensitivity
- BIB 1.20DDM 1.74
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.