LEGR ranks 3rd and BITQ 16th of 20 funds in the Crypto Industry Stocks Category.
BITQ vs LEGR
6.5%by weight
LEGR −0.20pt a year
0.85%0.65%
BITQ 61.7×the volume
115K1.87K
LEGR +16.8pt
−6.1%+10.7%
BITQ vs LEGR Performance
−26.8%+66.6%
- BITQ 0.85%
- LEGR 0.65%, better
- BITQ $349M
- LEGR $124M
- BITQ −30.5%
- LEGR +13.4%, better
- BITQ 0.00%
- LEGR 1.86%, better
- BITQ 30
- LEGR 109
- BITQ 115K sh, better
- LEGR 1.87K sh
- BITQ $21.18
- LEGR $65.02
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BITQ | LEGR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F13 | B55Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C46 | A97Higher |
| Tradability | B61Higher | D37 |
| Holdings | C46 | A89Higher |
| Durability | A79Higher | A77 |
Rank among Crypto Industry Stocks funds
Same Category. BITQ and LEGR are both graded against the same 20 Crypto Industry Stocks funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BITQD
LEGRB
In short
BITQ The crypto purist's stock basket. BITQ tracks a Bitwise-built index of about 30 companies, with most of the weight reserved for firms that earn the bulk of their revenue from crypto itself, not tech giants running a blockchain side project.
LEGR Blockchain, hold the coins. LEGR has tracked the Indxx Blockchain Index since January 2018, owning roughly 110 global companies that build with the technology or stand to benefit from it, rather than the tokens themselves.
Stated mandate
BITQ The Fund seeks to track the total return of the Bitwise Crypto Innovators 30 Index before fees and expenses. The Index targets companies substantially connected to the cryptocurrency ecosystem.
LEGR The Fund seeks to track the performance of the Indxx Blockchain Index before fees and expenses. The index targets companies involved with blockchain technology or positioned to benefit from its use in business processes.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BITQ vs LEGR Holdings
How BITQ and LEGR differ
6.5%
Shared holdings make up 12.1% of BITQ and 6.5% of LEGR.
Level by level
- Holdings6.5%
- Country45.3%
- Sector72.1%
Sector
| Sector | More in BITQMore in LEGR | BITQ | LEGR |
|---|---|---|---|
| Financials | BITQ +21.8 points | 71.2% | 49.4% |
| Communication | LEGR +8.5 points | 0.0% | 8.5% |
| Industrials | LEGR +6.3 points | 0.0% | 6.3% |
| Technology | BITQ +6.1 points | 27.4% | 21.3% |
| Consumer Discretionary | LEGR +5.7 points | 1.4% | 7.1% |
| Utilities | LEGR +3.0 points | 0.0% | 3.0% |
| Materials | LEGR +2.0 points | 0.0% | 2.0% |
| Consumer Staples | LEGR +1.4 points | 0.0% | 1.4% |
| Energy | LEGR +1.0 points | 0.0% | 1.0% |
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in BITQMore in LEGR | BITQ | LEGR |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | BITQ +50.0 points | 92.6% | 42.6% |
| China | LEGR +13.1 points | 0.0% | 13.1% |
| Germany | LEGR +6.8 points | 0.0% | 6.8% |
| United Kingdom | LEGR +5.9 points | 0.0% | 5.9% |
| Australia | LEGR +5.0 points | 0.0% | 5.0% |
| India | LEGR +4.2 points | 0.0% | 4.2% |
| Japan | LEGR +3.8 points | 0.0% | 3.8% |
| Canada | LEGR +3.7 points | 0.0% | 3.7% |
| Other countries (11) | LEGR +7.7 points | 7.4% | 15.1% |
Outside the US: LEGR 67% developed, 33% emerging.
Concentration
- BITQ60.9%
- LEGR13.2%
- BITQ30
- LEGR100
Asset class
- BITQ
- Equity
- LEGR
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in BITQ24
- In both6
- Only in LEGR94
Only in BITQ
24 securities, 87.9% of BITQ by weight
- Strategy12.25%
- Coinbase Global10.42%
- Circle Internet Group9.52%
- Hyperliquid Strategies5.45%
- Bitmine Immersion Technologies4.87%
- Hut 83.83%
- Galaxy Digital Holdings3.66%
- CleanSpark3.64%
- Figure3.62%
- MARA Holdings3.61%
- Securitize3.51%
- Bitdeer Technologies Group3.27%
- OSL Group2.75%
- Bullish2.74%
- Cipher Digital2.48%
- DBS Group Holdings1.85%
- Interactive Brokers1.67%
- HIVE Digital1.65%
- MercadoLibre1.65%
- BitGo Holdings1.48%
- Robinhood Markets1.40%
- Gemini Space Station0.95%
- HashKey Holdings0.89%
- CoinShares0.71%
Only in LEGR
94 securities, 93.0% of LEGR by weight
- Lockheed Martin Corporation1.43%
- Walmart Inc.1.39%
- S&P Global Inc.1.35%
- Tesla, Inc.1.31%
- Accenture plc1.30%
- Anz Group Holdings Ltd1.30%
- The Home Depot, Inc.1.28%
- Workday, Inc. (Class A)1.27%
- Bank of Communications Co., Ltd. (Class H)1.27%
- Westpac Banking Corporation1.27%
- Iberdrola S.A.1.27%
- Commonwealth Bank of Australia1.26%
- Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. (Class H)1.25%
- China Merchants Bank Co., Ltd. (Class H)1.25%
- The Toronto-Dominion Bank1.23%
- MetLife, Inc.1.23%
- Bank of China Ltd.1.23%
- HDFC Bank Ltd. (ADR)1.21%
- AIA Group Limited1.19%
- American Express Company1.18%
- Royal Bank of Canada1.17%
- BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Limited1.16%
- Cisco Systems, Inc.1.16%
- Allianz SE1.14%
- Meta Platforms, Inc. (Class A)1.14%
- Axa S.a.1.13%
- Airbus SE1.12%
- Shopify Inc. (Class A)1.12%
- First Abu Dhabi Bank PJSC1.11%
- Ping An Insurance (Group) Company of China, Ltd. (Class H)1.08%
- Ford Motor Company1.05%
- Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. (ADR)1.04%
- BHP Group Limited1.04%
- Infosys Limited (ADR)1.03%
- Tata Consultancy Services Limited1.03%
- ING Groep N.V. (ADR)1.02%
- Sap SE1.02%
- Shell plc (ADR)1.02%
- Nordea Bank Abp1.01%
- Lloyds Banking Group Plc (ADR)1.01%
- Barclays Plc1.01%
- Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation1.00%
- The Boeing Company1.00%
- Mercedes-Benz Group AG0.99%
- London Stock Exchange Group Plc0.99%
- International Business Machines Corporation0.99%
- Deutsche Boerse AG0.99%
- Rio Tinto plc (ADR)0.98%
- Honeywell International Inc.0.97%
- Sony Group Corp. (ADR)0.97%
Weight gaps
All 6 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.
| Holding | More in BITQMore in LEGR | BITQ | LEGR |
|---|---|---|---|
| Visa | BITQ +1.21 points | 2.22% | 1.01% |
| Mastercard | BITQ +1.20 points | 2.21% | 1.01% |
| Bank of New York Mellon | BITQ +0.98 points | 1.79% | 0.81% |
| CME Group | BITQ +0.84 points | 2.16% | 1.32% |
| BlackRock | BITQ +0.77 points | 2.05% | 1.28% |
| Morgan Stanley | BITQ +0.67 points | 1.70% | 1.03% |
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BITQ vs LEGR Cost
Overpaying BITQ vs LEGR
$3,482
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BITQ 0.85%
$16,199
LEGR 0.65%
$12,717
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BITQ | LEGR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,508 | $1,163 | $345 |
| 20 | $5,706 | $4,440 | $1,266 |
| 30 | $16,199 | $12,717 | $3,482 |
- 0.85%BITQ
- 0.65%LEGR, cheaper
- Middle half of Crypto Industry Stocks funds
- Median 0.66%
LEGR 8th cheapest of 20 funds
BITQ 16th cheapest of 20 funds
BITQ vs LEGR Dividends
- BITQ 0.00%
- LEGR 1.86%, better
- BITQ None
- LEGR $1.20
- BITQ
- LEGR $0.18
- BITQ
- LEGR Sep 24, 2026
- BITQ
- LEGR Sep 30, 2026
- BITQ
- LEGR Quarterly
Distribution history
BITQ vs LEGR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- BITQ
- LEGR
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BITQ 62.0%LEGR 11.7%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- BITQ 0.80LEGR 1.59, better
- Worst fall
- BITQ −90.3%LEGR −31.5%, better
- Market sensitivity
- BITQ 3.52LEGR 0.89
BITQ and LEGR in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.85% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.52%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.52%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.



