JUSA ranks 1st and BKCG 21st of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
BKCG vs JUSA
JUSA −0.32pt a year
0.50%0.18%
JUSA 43.3×the volume
2.28K98.8K
BKCG vs JUSA Performance
+7.7%+10.8%
- BKCG 0.50%
- JUSA 0.18%, better
- BKCG $119M
- JUSA $745M
- BKCG +7.7%
- JUSA +10.8%, better
- BKCG 0.65%
- JUSA 0.72%, better
- BKCG 30
- JUSA 263
- BKCG 2.28K sh
- JUSA 98.8K sh, better
- BKCG $38.80
- JUSA $67.75
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BKCG | JUSA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B62 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A84 | |
| Risk | A82 | A92Higher |
| Tradability | C51 | B58Higher |
| Holdings | D38 | A84Higher |
| Durability | A74 | A76Higher |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. BKCG and JUSA are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BKCGB
JUSAA
In short
BKCG Two dozen or so growth stocks and no index to hide behind. BKCG wraps a BNY Mellon conviction-growth strategy whose record dates to 1997 into an ETF, where one top holding can move the whole portfolio.
JUSA Active stock picking in index clothing: J.P. Morgan analysts tilt roughly 300 large caps while sector weights and risk stay close to the S&P 500, for 0.18% a year with no waiver attached.
Stated mandate
BKCG The fund invests in stocks that its sub-adviser identifies as growth companies, seeking exposure to businesses whose revenue is expected to grow faster than U.S. economic growth.
JUSA The fund seeks capital appreciation through active, fundamental, bottom-up selection of large-cap U.S. equities. It targets companies with strong long-term earnings potential and attractive valuations relative to peers.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BKCG vs JUSA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BKCG vs JUSA Cost
Overpaying BKCG vs JUSA
$6,230
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BKCG 0.50%
$9,979
JUSA 0.18%
$3,749
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BKCG | JUSA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $328 | $572 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $1,281 | $2,179 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $3,749 | $6,230 |
- 0.50%BKCG
- 0.18%JUSA, cheaper
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
JUSA cheapest of 90 funds
BKCG 33rd cheapest of 90 funds
BKCG vs JUSA Dividends
- BKCG 0.65%
- JUSA 0.72%, better
- BKCG $0.25
- JUSA $0.49
- BKCG $0.04
- JUSA $0.13
- BKCG Oct 1, 2026
- JUSA Sep 22, 2026
- BKCG Oct 6, 2026
- JUSA Sep 24, 2026
- BKCG Quarterly
- JUSA Quarterly
Distribution history
BKCG vs JUSA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BKCG 12.8%JUSA 11.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- BKCG 0.94JUSA 1.41
- Worst fall
- BKCG −12.1%JUSA −14.0%
- Market sensitivity
- BKCG 0.98JUSA 0.98Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
BKCG and JUSA in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

