BKEM ranks 3rd and GMF 8th of 20 funds in the Emerging Markets Stocks Category.
BKEM vs GMF
BKEM −0.38pt a year
0.11%0.49%
BKEM 1.9×the volume
15.4K8.19K
BKEM +0.9pt
+6.3%+5.4%
BKEM vs GMF Performance
+35.8%+30.1%
- BKEM 0.11%, better
- GMF 0.49%
- BKEM $101M
- GMF $387M
- BKEM +12.8%, better
- GMF +4.9%
- BKEM 1.25%
- GMF 1.27%, better
- BKEM 1805
- GMF 1312
- BKEM 15.4K sh, better
- GMF 8.19K sh
- BKEM $28.09
- GMF $148.88
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BKEM | GMF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A95Higher | C45 |
| Mission | A100Higher | A89 |
| Risk | B61Higher | B57 |
| Tradability | F21 | B56Higher |
| Holdings | A78 | |
| Durability | C48 | A80Higher |
Rank among Emerging Markets Stocks funds
Same Category. BKEM and GMF are both graded against the same 20 Emerging Markets Stocks funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BKEMA
GMFB
In short
BKEM The whole emerging world, priced like an afterthought. BNY Mellon charges 0.11% to hold well over a thousand large- and mid-cap stocks across developing markets. Broad, cheap, and very quiet.
GMF The emerging-markets fund that leaves out Brazil and South Africa on purpose. GMF holds emerging Asia only, roughly 1,300 stocks deep, and has been running since 2007.
Stated mandate
BKEM The fund is designed to follow the performance of an emerging-markets large- and mid-cap equity index.
GMF The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return performance of the S&P Emerging Asia Pacific BMI Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BKEM vs GMF Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BKEM vs GMF Cost
Overpaying GMF vs BKEM
$7,479
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BKEM 0.11%
$2,313
GMF 0.49%
$9,792
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BKEM | GMF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $201 | $883 | $682 |
| 20 | $788 | $3,394 | $2,606 |
| 30 | $2,313 | $9,792 | $7,479 |
- 0.11%BKEM, cheaper
- 0.49%GMF
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Stocks funds
- Median 0.45%
BKEM 2nd cheapest of 20 funds
GMF 12th cheapest of 20 funds
BKEM vs GMF Dividends
- BKEM 1.25%
- GMF 1.27%, better
- BKEM $0.35
- GMF $1.86
- BKEM $0.28
- GMF $0.66
- BKEM Jul 1, 2026
- GMF Jun 22, 2026
- BKEM Jul 7, 2026
- GMF Jun 26, 2026
- BKEM Twice a year
- GMF Twice a year
Distribution history
BKEM vs GMF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- BKEM
- GMF
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BKEM 16.2%GMF 13.3%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- BKEM 0.98GMF 0.98Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Worst fall
- BKEM −31.9%, betterGMF −33.2%
- Market sensitivity
- BKEM 1.12GMF 0.85
Popular comparisons
- 0.11% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.11% · 0.16%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.16%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.11% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.