Skip to content

GMF vs XCEM

State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF

GMFBNYSE Arca

Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF

XCEMANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

XCEM −0.33pt a year

GMF0.49%XCEM0.16%

Avg volume · 30D

XCEM 19.8×the volume

GMF8.19KXCEM162K

10Y return · a year

XCEM +1.5pt

GMF+8.5%XCEM+10.0%

GMF vs XCEM Performance

Nov 2, 2021 – Nov 2, 2026

+30.1%GMF+61.9%XCEM

Nov 2, 2021 to Nov 2, 2026. GMF +30.1%. XCEM +61.9%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−25%0%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026
Expense ratio
GMF 0.49%
XCEM 0.16%, better
Fund size
GMF $387M
XCEM $1.98B
1Y total return
GMF +4.9%
XCEM +24.1%, better
Yield (12M)
GMF 1.27%
XCEM 2.69%, better
Holdings
GMF 1312
XCEM 464
Avg volume (30D)
GMF 8.19K sh
XCEM 162K sh, better
NAV per share
GMF $148.88
XCEM $46.99
52W range

ETF.net Grade

GMF: Cost 45, Risk 57, Mission 89, Tradability 56, Holdings 78, Durability 80. XCEM: Cost 90, Risk 51, Mission 100, Tradability 62, Holdings 60, Durability 78.
Pillar letters and Scores for GMF, XCEM, with each pillar’s weight
PillarGMFXCEM
Cost30% weightC45A90Higher
Mission25% weightA89A100Higher
Risk15% weightB57HigherC51
Tradability15% weightB56B62Higher
Holdings10% weightA78HigherB60
Durability5% weightA80HigherA78

Rank among Emerging Markets Stocks funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. GMF and XCEM are both graded against the same 20 Emerging Markets Stocks funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Emerging Markets Stocks⁠

Category · 20 funds
See all 20 ›

XCEM ranks 2nd and GMF 8th of 20 funds in the Emerging Markets Stocks Category.

  1. Rank 1AVEXCVanguard Emerging Markets Ex-China ETFScore 82
  2. Rank 2AXCEMColumbia EM Core ex-China ETFScore 78
  3. Rank 3ABKEMBNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETFScore 75
  4. Rank 7BDEXCDimensional Emerging Markets ex China Core Equity ETFScore 66
  5. Rank 8BGMFState Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETFScore 64
  6. Rank 9BGSEEGoldman Sachs MarketBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETFScore 63

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

GMFBState Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF

XCEMAColumbia EM Core ex-China ETF

In short

GMF The emerging-markets fund that leaves out Brazil and South Africa on purpose. GMF holds emerging Asia only, roughly 1,300 stocks deep, and has been running since 2007.

XCEM The original ex-China emerging markets fund. Columbia launched XCEM in 2015, back when carving China out of an EM sleeve was a fringe idea rather than a crowded shelf. Roughly 150 EM stocks, no China, 0.16% a year.

Stated mandate

GMF The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return performance of the S&P Emerging Asia Pacific BMI Index.

XCEM The fund seeks investment results that correspond to the performance of the EGAI Emerging Markets ex-China Index before fees and expenses. It generally invests at least 80% of net assets in index companies and seeks to replicate the index.

Why people hold it

  • GMF Pure emerging Asia by design. The index is Asia Pacific only, so no Latin America or EMEA names dilute the regional call.ssga.com
  • Roughly 1,300 holdings reaches well past the megacaps most emerging-markets funds stop at, giving broader coverage of the region's listed market.
  • It has hugged its S&P index closely, one of the tighter implementations in its emerging-markets peer group.
  • Trading since 2007, a long live record for a single-region emerging-markets fund, backed by a State Street SPDR lineup.
  • XCEM Launched in 2015 as the first broad emerging markets ETF built to leave China out, and it has since grown into a billion-dollar-plus fund.morningstar.com
  • 0.16% a year, well under the typical fund in its emerging markets cohort, for a portfolio of about 150 stocks.
  • Plain mandate, closely followed: at least 80% of net assets in index companies, replicated rather than approximated, with tracking that has stayed tight.
  • One of the strongest implementations in its emerging markets peer group, and liquid enough that getting in and out is rarely the hard part.

Worth knowing

  • GMF The regional focus costs 0.49% a year. Broad emerging-markets index funds like VEXC (0.07%) and BKEM (0.11%) charge a fraction of that.
  • It is thinly traded, so bid-ask spreads can widen, especially on larger orders or outside Asian market hours.
  • Distributions land annually or semiannually rather than quarterly, so cash flow arrives in lumps.
  • XCEM No China means no Tencent, no Alibaba, no A-shares. If that exposure belongs in the portfolio, it has to come from somewhere else.
  • Emerging market stocks swing hard and currency moves add to the ride. This is one of the higher-volatility corners of equity investing.
  • Cheap, not cheapest: VEXC runs the same ex-China EM idea at 0.07%. XCEM's edge is a decade of history, not the lowest fee on the shelf.

Full GMF profile⁠

Full XCEM profile⁠

GMF vs XCEM Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

GMF vs XCEM Cost

Overpaying GMF vs XCEM

$6,450

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • GMF 0.49%

    $9,792

  • XCEM 0.16%

    $3,342

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • GMF 0.49%
  • XCEM 0.16%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530GMF $9,792XCEM $3,342

Year by year

YearGMFXCEMOverpaying
10$883$292$591
20$3,394$1,141$2,253
30$9,792$3,342$6,450

Expense ratio

  • 0.49%GMF
  • 0.16%XCEM, cheaper
  • Middle half of Emerging Markets Stocks funds
  • Median 0.45%

XCEM 3rd cheapest of 20 funds

GMF 12th cheapest of 20 funds

GMF vs XCEM Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
GMF 1.27%
XCEM 2.69%, better
Payout (12M)
GMF $1.86
XCEM $1.25
Last payment
GMF $0.66
XCEM $1.25
Ex-dividend
GMF Jun 22, 2026
XCEM Dec 18, 2025
Paid on
GMF Jun 26, 2026
XCEM Dec 26, 2025
Frequency
GMF Twice a year
XCEM Annual

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

GMFTwice a year · 19 paymentsAll GMF payments⁠
One bar per payment. 19 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Jun 16, 2017 $0.40; Dec 15, 2017 $1.38; Jun 15, 2018 $0.52; Dec 24, 2018 $1.46; Jun 24, 2019 $0.59; Dec 23, 2019 $1.22; Jun 22, 2020 $0.57; Dec 21, 2020 $1.11; Jun 21, 2021 $0.58; Dec 20, 2021 $2.72; Jun 21, 2022 $0.70; Dec 20, 2022 $1.74; Jun 20, 2023 $0.86; Dec 18, 2023 $1.92; Jun 24, 2024 $0.64; Dec 23, 2024 $1.58; Jun 23, 2025 $0.86; Dec 22, 2025 $1.20; Jun 22, 2026 $0.66. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.502017202020232026YTD
XCEMAnnual · 9 paymentsAll XCEM payments⁠
One bar per payment. 9 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 15, 2017 $2.37; Dec 21, 2018 $0.77; Dec 20, 2019 $0.59; Dec 18, 2020 $0.49; Dec 20, 2021 $0.62; Dec 19, 2022 $0.62; Dec 18, 2023 $0.37; Dec 18, 2024 $0.82; Dec 18, 2025 $1.25. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.502017202020232026YTD

GMF vs XCEM Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • GMF
  • XCEM
Nov 2, 2021 to Nov 2, 2026. Worst fall: GMF −33.2% · Oct 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−30%−20%−10%0%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
GMF 13.3%, betterXCEM 20.0%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
GMF 0.98, betterXCEM 0.95
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
GMF −33.2%XCEM −29.5%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
GMF 0.85XCEM 1.27

GMF and XCEM in the news

Popular comparisons

  • GMFBvsVEXCA

    State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF · Vanguard Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.07%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XCEMAvsVEXCA

    Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF · Vanguard Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.16% · 0.07%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GMFBvsBKEMA

    State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF · BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.11%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XCEMAvsBKEMA

    Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF · BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.16% · 0.11%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GMFBvsXSOEA

    State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF · WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.32%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XCEMAvsXSOEA

    Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF · WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.16% · 0.32%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.