XSOE ranks 4th and GMF 8th of 20 funds in the Emerging Markets Stocks Category.
GMF vs XSOE
XSOE −0.17pt a year
0.49%0.32%
XSOE 11.8×the volume
8.19K97K
GMF +0.5pt
+8.5%+8.0%
GMF vs XSOE Performance
+30.1%+22.3%
- GMF 0.49%
- XSOE 0.32%, better
- GMF $387M
- XSOE $1.91B
- GMF +4.9%
- XSOE +10.8%, better
- GMF 1.27%
- XSOE 1.81%, better
- GMF 1312
- XSOE 866
- GMF 8.19K sh
- XSOE 97K sh, better
- GMF $148.88
- XSOE $43.15
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GMF | XSOE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C45 | A71Higher |
| Mission | A89 | A100Higher |
| Risk | B57Higher | C48 |
| Tradability | B56Higher | C53 |
| Holdings | A78Higher | B59 |
| Durability | A80 | A81Higher |
Rank among Emerging Markets Stocks funds
Same Category. GMF and XSOE are both graded against the same 20 Emerging Markets Stocks funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GMFB
XSOEA
In short
GMF The emerging-markets fund that leaves out Brazil and South Africa on purpose. GMF holds emerging Asia only, roughly 1,300 stocks deep, and has been running since 2007.
XSOE One screen, applied hard: if a government owns more than 20% of a company, XSOE leaves it out. What is left is emerging markets minus the state champions, with country weights pushed back toward the standard EM mix.
Stated mandate
GMF The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return performance of the S&P Emerging Asia Pacific BMI Index.
XSOE The fund seeks to track the investment results of emerging-market companies that are not state-owned enterprises, defined as companies with no more than 20% government ownership.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GMF vs XSOE Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GMF vs XSOE Cost
Overpaying GMF vs XSOE
$3,250
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GMF 0.49%
$9,792
XSOE 0.32%
$6,542
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GMF | XSOE | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $883 | $580 | $303 |
| 20 | $3,394 | $2,250 | $1,144 |
| 30 | $9,792 | $6,542 | $3,250 |
- 0.49%GMF
- 0.32%XSOE, cheaper
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Stocks funds
- Median 0.45%
XSOE 6th cheapest of 20 funds
GMF 12th cheapest of 20 funds
GMF vs XSOE Dividends
- GMF 1.27%
- XSOE 1.81%, better
- GMF $1.86
- XSOE $0.78
- GMF $0.66
- XSOE $0.22
- GMF Jun 22, 2026
- XSOE Sep 25, 2026
- GMF Jun 26, 2026
- XSOE Sep 29, 2026
- GMF Twice a year
- XSOE Quarterly
Distribution history
GMF vs XSOE Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- GMF
- XSOE
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GMF 13.3%, betterXSOE 17.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- GMF 0.98, betterXSOE 0.90
- Worst fall
- GMF −33.2%, betterXSOE −37.2%
- Market sensitivity
- GMF 0.85XSOE 1.18
Popular comparisons
- 0.49% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.32% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.16%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.32% · 0.16%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.11%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.32% · 0.11%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.