BKEM ranks 3rd and KEMX 5th of 20 funds in the Emerging Markets Stocks Category.
BKEM vs KEMX
BKEM −0.13pt a year
0.11%0.24%
BKEM 1.8×the volume
15.4K8.67K
KEMX +5.4pt
+6.3%+11.7%
BKEM vs KEMX Performance
+35.8%+74.1%
- BKEM 0.11%, better
- KEMX 0.24%
- BKEM $101M
- KEMX $124M
- BKEM +12.7%
- KEMX +30.9%, better
- BKEM 1.25%
- KEMX 2.60%, better
- BKEM 1805
- KEMX 278
- BKEM 15.4K sh, better
- KEMX 8.67K sh
- BKEM $28.09
- KEMX $47.82
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BKEM | KEMX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A95Higher | A81 |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | B61Higher | B55 |
| Tradability | F23Higher | F15 |
| Holdings | B62 | |
| Durability | C48 | C54Higher |
Rank among Emerging Markets Stocks funds
Same Category. BKEM and KEMX are both graded against the same 20 Emerging Markets Stocks funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BKEMA
KEMXB
In short
BKEM The whole emerging world, priced like an afterthought. BNY Mellon charges 0.11% to hold well over a thousand large- and mid-cap stocks across developing markets. Broad, cheap, and very quiet.
KEMX KraneShares made its name on China funds. This is the one that leaves China out: roughly 300 large and mid cap stocks from the rest of the emerging world, at 0.24% net of a waiver through August 1, 2028.
Stated mandate
BKEM The fund is designed to follow the performance of an emerging-markets large- and mid-cap equity index.
KEMX The Fund seeks to track the price and yield performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. It normally invests at least 80% of assets in securities or instruments corresponding to that index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BKEM vs KEMX Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BKEM vs KEMX Cost
Overpaying KEMX vs BKEM
$2,646
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BKEM 0.11%
$2,313
KEMX 0.24%
$4,959
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BKEM | KEMX | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $201 | $437 | $236 |
| 20 | $788 | $1,699 | $911 |
| 30 | $2,313 | $4,959 | $2,646 |
- 0.11%BKEM, cheaper
- 0.24%KEMX
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Stocks funds
- Median 0.45%
BKEM 2nd cheapest of 20 funds
KEMX 5th cheapest of 20 funds
BKEM vs KEMX Dividends
- BKEM 1.25%
- KEMX 2.60%, better
- BKEM $0.35
- KEMX $1.22
- BKEM $0.28
- KEMX $0.04
- BKEM Jul 1, 2026
- KEMX Dec 30, 2025
- BKEM Jul 7, 2026
- KEMX Dec 31, 2025
- BKEM Twice a year
- KEMX Irregular
Distribution history
BKEM vs KEMX Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- BKEM
- KEMX
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BKEM 16.2%, betterKEMX 20.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- BKEM 0.98KEMX 1.06, better
- Worst fall
- BKEM −31.9%KEMX −30.8%, better
- Market sensitivity
- BKEM 1.12KEMX 1.33
Popular comparisons
- 0.11% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.24% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.11% · 0.16%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.24% · 0.16%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.11% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.24% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.