XCEM ranks 2nd and KEMX 5th of 20 funds in the Emerging Markets Stocks Category.
KEMX vs XCEM
XCEM −0.08pt a year
0.24%0.16%
XCEM 18.7×the volume
8.67K162K
KEMX +1.6pt
+11.7%+10.1%
KEMX vs XCEM Performance
+74.1%+61.9%
- KEMX 0.24%
- XCEM 0.16%, better
- KEMX $124M
- XCEM $2.01B
- KEMX +30.9%, better
- XCEM +24.3%
- KEMX 2.60%
- XCEM 2.68%, better
- KEMX 278
- XCEM 465
- KEMX 8.67K sh
- XCEM 162K sh, better
- KEMX $47.82
- XCEM $46.99
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | KEMX | XCEM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A81 | A90Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | B55Higher | C51 |
| Tradability | F15 | B62Higher |
| Holdings | B62Higher | B60 |
| Durability | C54 | A78Higher |
Rank among Emerging Markets Stocks funds
Same Category. KEMX and XCEM are both graded against the same 20 Emerging Markets Stocks funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
KEMXB
XCEMA
In short
KEMX KraneShares made its name on China funds. This is the one that leaves China out: roughly 300 large and mid cap stocks from the rest of the emerging world, at 0.24% net of a waiver through August 1, 2028.
XCEM The original ex-China emerging markets fund. Columbia launched XCEM in 2015, back when carving China out of an EM sleeve was a fringe idea rather than a crowded shelf. Roughly 150 EM stocks, no China, 0.16% a year.
Stated mandate
KEMX The Fund seeks to track the price and yield performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. It normally invests at least 80% of assets in securities or instruments corresponding to that index.
XCEM The fund seeks investment results that correspond to the performance of the EGAI Emerging Markets ex-China Index before fees and expenses. It generally invests at least 80% of net assets in index companies and seeks to replicate the index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
KEMX vs XCEM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
KEMX vs XCEM Cost
Overpaying KEMX vs XCEM
$1,617
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
KEMX 0.24%
$4,959
XCEM 0.16%
$3,342
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | KEMX | XCEM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $437 | $292 | $145 |
| 20 | $1,699 | $1,141 | $558 |
| 30 | $4,959 | $3,342 | $1,617 |
- 0.24%KEMX
- 0.16%XCEM, cheaper
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Stocks funds
- Median 0.45%
XCEM 3rd cheapest of 20 funds
KEMX 5th cheapest of 20 funds
KEMX vs XCEM Dividends
- KEMX 2.60%
- XCEM 2.68%, better
- KEMX $1.22
- XCEM $1.25
- KEMX $0.04
- XCEM $1.25
- KEMX Dec 30, 2025
- XCEM Dec 18, 2025
- KEMX Dec 31, 2025
- XCEM Dec 26, 2025
- KEMX Irregular
- XCEM Annual
Distribution history
KEMX vs XCEM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- KEMX
- XCEM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- KEMX 20.0%XCEM 20.0%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Return per unit of risk
- KEMX 1.06, betterXCEM 0.95
- Worst fall
- KEMX −30.8%XCEM −29.5%, better
- Market sensitivity
- KEMX 1.33XCEM 1.27
KEMX and XCEM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.24% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.16% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.24% · 0.11%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.16% · 0.11%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.24% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.16% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

