BKEM ranks 3rd and XC 9th of 20 funds in the Emerging Markets Stocks Category.
BKEM vs XC
BKEM −0.21pt a year
0.11%0.32%
BKEM 1.2×the volume
15.4K12.9K
BKEM +10.3pt
+20.9%+10.6%
BKEM vs XC Performance
+12.7%−5.0%
- BKEM 0.11%, better
- XC 0.32%
- BKEM $101M
- XC $72M
- BKEM +12.7%, better
- XC −5.0%
- BKEM 1.25%
- XC 12.88%, better
- BKEM 1805
- XC 549
- BKEM 15.4K sh, better
- XC 12.9K sh
- BKEM $28.09
- XC $29.80
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BKEM | XC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A95Higher | A71 |
| Mission | A100Higher | A73 |
| Risk | B61Higher | C52 |
| Tradability | F23 | C46Higher |
| Holdings | A73 | |
| Durability | C48Higher | D30 |
Rank among Emerging Markets Stocks funds
Same Category. BKEM and XC are both graded against the same 20 Emerging Markets Stocks funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BKEMA
XCB
In short
BKEM The whole emerging world, priced like an afterthought. BNY Mellon charges 0.11% to hold well over a thousand large- and mid-cap stocks across developing markets. Broad, cheap, and very quiet.
XC Most ex-China EM funds still lean hard on Korea and Taiwan. XC cuts all three, then screens out companies with 20% or more government ownership. Emerging markets at its most literal, roughly 800 names deep.
Stated mandate
BKEM The fund is designed to follow the performance of an emerging-markets large- and mid-cap equity index.
XC The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the WisdomTree True Emerging Markets Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BKEM vs XC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BKEM vs XC Cost
Overpaying XC vs BKEM
$4,229
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BKEM 0.11%
$2,313
XC 0.32%
$6,542
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BKEM | XC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $201 | $580 | $379 |
| 20 | $788 | $2,250 | $1,462 |
| 30 | $2,313 | $6,542 | $4,229 |
- 0.11%BKEM, cheaper
- 0.32%XC
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Stocks funds
- Median 0.45%
BKEM 2nd cheapest of 20 funds
XC 6th cheapest of 20 funds
BKEM vs XC Dividends
- BKEM 1.25%
- XC 12.88%, better
- BKEM $0.35
- XC $3.84
- BKEM $0.28
- XC $0.12
- BKEM Jul 1, 2026
- XC Sep 25, 2026
- BKEM Jul 7, 2026
- XC Sep 29, 2026
- BKEM Twice a year
- XC Quarterly
Distribution history
BKEM vs XC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BKEM 16.2%XC 12.6%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- BKEM 0.98, betterXC 0.51
- Worst fall
- BKEM −31.9%XC −21.2%
- Market sensitivity
- BKEM 1.12XC 0.81
Popular comparisons
- 0.11% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.32% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.11% · 0.16%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.32% · 0.16%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.11% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.32% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.