XCEM ranks 2nd and XC 9th of 20 funds in the Emerging Markets Stocks Category.
XC vs XCEM
XCEM −0.16pt a year
0.32%0.16%
XCEM 12.6×the volume
12.9K162K
XCEM +13.2pt
+10.6%+23.8%
XC vs XCEM Performance
−5.0%+24.3%
- XC 0.32%
- XCEM 0.16%, better
- XC $72M
- XCEM $2.01B
- XC −5.0%
- XCEM +24.3%, better
- XC 12.88%, better
- XCEM 2.68%
- XC 549
- XCEM 465
- XC 12.9K sh
- XCEM 162K sh, better
- XC $29.80
- XCEM $46.99
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | XC | XCEM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A71 | A90Higher |
| Mission | A73 | A100Higher |
| Risk | C52Higher | C51 |
| Tradability | C46 | B62Higher |
| Holdings | A73Higher | B60 |
| Durability | D30 | A78Higher |
Rank among Emerging Markets Stocks funds
Same Category. XC and XCEM are both graded against the same 20 Emerging Markets Stocks funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
XCB
XCEMA
In short
XC Most ex-China EM funds still lean hard on Korea and Taiwan. XC cuts all three, then screens out companies with 20% or more government ownership. Emerging markets at its most literal, roughly 800 names deep.
XCEM The original ex-China emerging markets fund. Columbia launched XCEM in 2015, back when carving China out of an EM sleeve was a fringe idea rather than a crowded shelf. Roughly 150 EM stocks, no China, 0.16% a year.
Stated mandate
XC The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the WisdomTree True Emerging Markets Index.
XCEM The fund seeks investment results that correspond to the performance of the EGAI Emerging Markets ex-China Index before fees and expenses. It generally invests at least 80% of net assets in index companies and seeks to replicate the index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
XC vs XCEM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
XC vs XCEM Cost
Overpaying XC vs XCEM
$3,200
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
XC 0.32%
$6,542
XCEM 0.16%
$3,342
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | XC | XCEM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $580 | $292 | $288 |
| 20 | $2,250 | $1,141 | $1,109 |
| 30 | $6,542 | $3,342 | $3,200 |
- 0.32%XC
- 0.16%XCEM, cheaper
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Stocks funds
- Median 0.45%
XCEM 3rd cheapest of 20 funds
XC 6th cheapest of 20 funds
XC vs XCEM Dividends
- XC 12.88%, better
- XCEM 2.68%
- XC $3.84
- XCEM $1.25
- XC $0.12
- XCEM $1.25
- XC Sep 25, 2026
- XCEM Dec 18, 2025
- XC Sep 29, 2026
- XCEM Dec 26, 2025
- XC Quarterly
- XCEM Annual
Distribution history
XC vs XCEM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- XC 12.6%, betterXCEM 20.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- XC 0.51XCEM 0.95, better
- Worst fall
- XC −21.2%XCEM −29.5%
- Market sensitivity
- XC 0.81XCEM 1.27
XC and XCEM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.32% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.16% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.32% · 0.11%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.16% · 0.11%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.32% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.16% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

