PSR ranks 2nd and BMED 7th of 35 funds in the US Active Sector Category.
BMED vs PSR
PSR −0.20pt a year
0.55%0.35%
BMED 1.5×the volume
2.15K1.45K
BMED +3.2pt
+4.2%+1.0%
BMED vs PSR Performance
+23.0%+5.1%
- BMED 0.55%
- PSR 0.35%, better
- BMED $15M
- PSR $57M
- BMED +28.3%, better
- PSR +13.9%
- BMED 0.22%
- PSR 2.70%, better
- BMED 61
- PSR 37
- BMED 2.15K sh, better
- PSR 1.45K sh
- BMED $36.46
- PSR $100.85
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BMED | PSR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A72 | A85Higher |
| Mission | A77 | |
| Risk | B61Higher | B56 |
| Tradability | D31 | B58Higher |
| Holdings | A74Higher | B66 |
| Durability | B60 | A75Higher |
Rank among US Active Sector funds
Same Category. BMED and PSR are both graded against the same 35 US Active Sector funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BMEDB
PSRA
In short
BMED Most health ETFs are a shelf of mega-cap pharma. BMED's stock pickers hunt the other end: roughly 60 innovative and emerging health names tilted to mid and small caps worldwide, 0.55% net of a waiver through June 30, 2027.
PSR Active REIT stock-picking without the active price tag: since 2008, PSR has run a tight book of about 30 US property names for 0.35% a year, roughly half the median fee among active US equity ETFs.
Stated mandate
BMED The Fund seeks to maximize total return through active investment in innovative and emerging healthcare companies.
PSR The Fund seeks high total return through capital appreciation and current income, investing principally in equity real estate investment trusts.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BMED vs PSR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BMED vs PSR Cost
Overpaying BMED vs PSR
$3,778
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BMED 0.55%
$10,904
PSR 0.35%
$7,126
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BMED | PSR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $988 | $634 | $354 |
| 20 | $3,790 | $2,454 | $1,336 |
| 30 | $10,904 | $7,126 | $3,778 |
- 0.55%BMED
- 0.35%PSR, cheaper
- Middle half of US Active Sector funds
- Median 0.61%
PSR 6th cheapest of 35 funds
BMED 10th cheapest of 35 funds
BMED vs PSR Dividends
- BMED 0.22%
- PSR 2.70%, better
- BMED $0.08
- PSR $2.72
- BMED $0.08
- PSR $0.67
- BMED Jun 15, 2026
- PSR Sep 21, 2026
- BMED Jun 18, 2026
- PSR Sep 25, 2026
- BMED Irregular
- PSR Quarterly
Distribution history
BMED vs PSR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- BMED
- PSR
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BMED 15.3%, betterPSR 16.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- BMED 1.03, betterPSR 0.54
- Worst fall
- BMED −32.1%, betterPSR −34.8%
- Market sensitivity
- BMED 0.74PSR 0.95
Popular comparisons
- 0.55% · 0.17%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.17%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.55% · 0.44%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.44%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.55% · 0.14%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.14%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.