Skip to content

BMED vs TRUT

iShares Health Innovation Active ETF

BMEDBNYSE Arca

VanEck Technology TruSector ETF

TRUTANasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

TRUT −0.41pt a year

BMED0.55%TRUT0.14%

Avg volume · 30D

TRUT 84.6×the volume

BMED2.15KTRUT182K

BMED vs TRUT Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+28.3%BMED+12.7%TRUT

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. BMED +28.3%. TRUT +12.7%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%−10%0%20%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
BMED 0.55%
TRUT 0.14%, better
Fund size
BMED $15M
TRUT $238M
1Y total return
BMED +28.3%, better
TRUT +12.7%
Yield (12M)
BMED 0.22%
TRUT 0.35%, better
Holdings
BMED 61
TRUT 77
Avg volume (30D)
BMED 2.15K sh
TRUT 182K sh, better
NAV per share
BMED $36.46
TRUT $31.15
52W range

ETF.net Grade

BMED: Cost 72, Risk 61, Mission 77, Tradability 31, Holdings 74, Durability 60. TRUT: Cost 93, Risk 23, Mission not scored, Tradability 96, Holdings 31, Durability 61.
Pillar letters and Scores for BMED, TRUT, with each pillar’s weight
PillarBMEDTRUT
Cost30% weightA72A93Higher
Mission25% weightA77Not scored
Risk15% weightB61HigherF23
Tradability15% weightD31A96Higher
Holdings10% weightA74HigherD31
Durability5% weightB60B61Higher

Rank among US Active Sector funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. BMED and TRUT are both graded against the same 35 US Active Sector funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Sector⁠

Category · 35 funds
See all 35 ›

TRUT ranks 4th and BMED 7th of 35 funds in the US Active Sector Category.

  1. Rank 1AAVREAvantis Real Estate ETFScore 77
  2. Rank 2APSRInvesco Active U.S. Real Estate ETFScore 70
  3. Rank 2BTMEDT. Rowe Price Health Care ETFScore 70
  4. Rank 4ATRUTVanEck Technology TruSector ETFScore 69
  5. Rank 5BUTESVirtus Reaves Utilities ETFScore 66
  6. Rank 6BTRUCVanEck Communication Services TruSector ETFScore 64
  7. Rank 7BBMEDiShares Health Innovation Active ETFScore 61
  8. Rank 7BLFSCF/M Emerald Life Sciences Innovation ETFScore 61

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

BMEDBiShares Health Innovation Active ETF

TRUTAVanEck Technology TruSector ETF

In short

BMED Most health ETFs are a shelf of mega-cap pharma. BMED's stock pickers hunt the other end: roughly 60 innovative and emerging health names tilted to mid and small caps worldwide, 0.55% net of a waiver through June 30, 2027.

TRUT Diversification rules force most tech ETFs to trim their biggest names. TRUT's answer: own the giants directly up to the legal line, then top up with sector ETFs so the portfolio mirrors the sector's real shape.

Stated mandate

BMED The Fund seeks to maximize total return through active investment in innovative and emerging healthcare companies.

TRUT The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through active investment in securities of information technology-related companies or instruments providing exposure to them.

Why people hold it

  • BMED Mandate is specific: at least 80% of net assets in health sciences stocks, with the focus on mid- and small-cap innovators anywhere in the world, emerging markets included.sec.gov
  • 0.55% net of a waiver through June 30, 2027 (0.77% gross), below the median fee among the 35 active sector funds in its group.
  • Reach goes past drugmakers: devices, diagnostics, REITs that own hospitals, even animal and plant health sit inside the prospectus definition.sec.gov
  • About 60 names means each pick carries weight, and the portfolio matches the innovation mandate it advertises, one of the stronger builds in its active sector peer group.
  • TRUT The mechanism is the point. Fund rules cap one stock at 25% and stocks above 5% at 50% combined; TRUT fills the gap with targeted sector ETFs instead of overweighting smaller names.vaneck.comvaneck.com 2
  • 0.14% a year for an actively managed fund, against a median near 0.65% across active US equity peers. Cheap enough to sit alongside index products.
  • One of the two originals in VanEck's TruSector line, launched in 2025. The approach has since been extended across all 11 GICS sectors.vaneck.comvaneck.com 2
  • About 80 positions, quarterly distributions, and steady day-to-day trading. On cost and tradability it lands in the upper tier of its active US equity cohort.

Worth knowing

  • BMED Small fund, light trading. Spreads can widen and the market price can drift from net asset value, which bites hardest on bigger orders.sec.gov
  • Mid caps, small caps and emerging-market names in a book of about 60 stocks move harder in both directions than mega-cap pharma.sec.gov
  • That 0.55% leans on a waiver running to June 30, 2027; gross is 0.77%. Active healthcare peer TMED charges 0.44% with no waiver attached.
  • TRUT Part of the exposure arrives through other ETFs rather than shares the fund holds outright. That is the workaround that makes uncapped weights possible, and it adds a layer.vaneck.com
  • Uncapped means concentrated. Leaning fully into tech's largest companies ties results to a handful of mega-caps more tightly than a capped sector fund would.vaneck.com
  • Launched August 2025, so there is only a short record of how closely the hybrid build actually shadows an uncapped tech benchmark.

Full BMED profile⁠

Full TRUT profile⁠

BMED vs TRUT Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

BMED vs TRUT Cost

Overpaying BMED vs TRUT

$7,972

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • BMED 0.55%

    $10,904

  • TRUT 0.14%

    $2,932

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • BMED 0.55%
  • TRUT 0.14%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530BMED $10,904TRUT $2,932

Year by year

YearBMEDTRUTOverpaying
10$988$256$732
20$3,790$1,000$2,790
30$10,904$2,932$7,972

Expense ratio

  • 0.55%BMED
  • 0.14%TRUT, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Active Sector funds
  • Median 0.61%

TRUT 3rd cheapest of 35 funds

BMED 10th cheapest of 35 funds

BMED vs TRUT Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
BMED 0.22%
TRUT 0.35%, better
Payout (12M)
BMED $0.08
TRUT $0.11
Last payment
BMED $0.08
TRUT $0.03
Ex-dividend
BMED Jun 15, 2026
TRUT Oct 1, 2026
Paid on
BMED Jun 18, 2026
TRUT Oct 6, 2026
Frequency
BMED Irregular
TRUT Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

BMEDIrregular · 2 paymentsAll BMED payments⁠
One bar per payment. 2 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 20, 2023 $0.0072; Jun 15, 2026 $0.08. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.0520232026YTD
TRUTQuarterly · 5 paymentsAll TRUT payments⁠
One bar per payment. 5 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Oct 1, 2025 $0.01; Dec 29, 2025 $0.02; Apr 1, 2026 $0.03; Jul 1, 2026 $0.03; Oct 1, 2026 $0.03. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.0520232026YTD

BMED vs TRUT Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
BMED 15.3%TRUT 26.8%since Sep 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
BMED 1.03TRUT 0.78since Sep 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
BMED −32.1%TRUT −18.6%since Aug 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
BMED 0.74TRUT 1.76

Popular comparisons

  • BMEDBvsAVREA

    iShares Health Innovation Active ETF · Avantis Real Estate ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.55% · 0.17%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TRUTAvsAVREA

    VanEck Technology TruSector ETF · Avantis Real Estate ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.14% · 0.17%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BMEDBvsPSRA

    iShares Health Innovation Active ETF · Invesco Active U.S. Real Estate ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.55% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TRUTAvsPSRA

    VanEck Technology TruSector ETF · Invesco Active U.S. Real Estate ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.14% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BMEDBvsTMEDB

    iShares Health Innovation Active ETF · T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.55% · 0.44%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TRUTAvsTMEDB

    VanEck Technology TruSector ETF · T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.14% · 0.44%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.