BNDW ranks 2nd and MAMB 28th of 28 funds in the Global Aggregate Bond (Unhedged) Category.
BNDW vs MAMB
BNDW −1.10pt a year
0.05%1.15%
BNDW 3.8×the volume
117K30.9K
MAMB +0.2pt
+0.1%+0.3%
BNDW vs MAMB Performance
+0.4%+1.4%
- BNDW 0.05%, better
- MAMB 1.15%
- BNDW $1.9B
- MAMB $199M
- BNDW −0.4%
- MAMB +0.2%, better
- BNDW 4.36%, better
- MAMB 2.77%
- BNDW 4
- MAMB 10
- BNDW 117K sh, better
- MAMB 30.9K sh
- BNDW $66.90
- MAMB $23.42
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BNDW | MAMB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | F0 |
| Mission | A100Higher | A70 |
| Risk | C43Higher | D37 |
| Tradability | B67Higher | C49 |
| Holdings | F20 | F24Higher |
| Durability | A83Higher | C43 |
Rank among Global Aggregate Bond (Unhedged) funds
Same Category. BNDW and MAMB are both graded against the same 28 Global Aggregate Bond (Unhedged) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BNDWA
MAMBD
In short
BNDW One ticker for the whole investment-grade bond market, home and abroad. Vanguard built BNDW as a wrapper around its own US and international bond funds and prices the package at 0.05% a year.
MAMB Most global bond funds buy bonds and sit still. MAMB tracks an index that reads employment data, sorts the economy into cycle phases, and reshuffles about a dozen bond ETFs monthly. A macro overlay in index clothing.
Stated mandate
BNDW The fund seeks to track the Bloomberg Global Aggregate Float Adjusted Composite Index and provide broad exposure to the global investment-grade bond market through an ETF-of-ETFs structure.
MAMB The Fund seeks to replicate, before fees and expenses, the performance of the Monarch Ambassador Income Index. It invests at least 80% of assets in Index constituents and uses a replication-indexing strategy.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BNDW vs MAMB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BNDW vs MAMB Cost
Overpaying MAMB vs BNDW
$20,017
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BNDW 0.05%
$1,060
MAMB 1.15%
$21,077
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BNDW | MAMB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $92 | $2,015 | $1,923 |
| 20 | $360 | $7,521 | $7,161 |
| 30 | $1,060 | $21,077 | $20,017 |
- 0.05%BNDW, cheaper
- 1.15%MAMB
- Middle half of Global Aggregate Bond (Unhedged) funds
- Median 0.40%
BNDW cheapest of 28 funds
MAMB 28th cheapest of 28 funds
BNDW vs MAMB Dividends
- BNDW 4.36%, better
- MAMB 2.77%
- BNDW $2.92
- MAMB $0.65
- BNDW $0.20
- MAMB $0.16
- BNDW Oct 1, 2026
- MAMB Sep 24, 2026
- BNDW Oct 5, 2026
- MAMB Sep 29, 2026
- BNDW Monthly
- MAMB Quarterly
Distribution history
BNDW vs MAMB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- BNDW
- MAMB
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BNDW 4.7%, betterMAMB 6.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- BNDW 0.10MAMB 0.37, better
- Worst fall
- BNDW −16.2%, betterMAMB −19.1%
- Market sensitivity
- BNDW 0.82MAMB 1.12
BNDW and MAMB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.05% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.15% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.15% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.15% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
