DFGX ranks 4th and MAMB 28th of 28 funds in the Global Aggregate Bond (Unhedged) Category.
DFGX vs MAMB
DFGX −0.95pt a year
0.20%1.15%
DFGX 7.1×the volume
218K30.9K
DFGX vs MAMB Performance
−0.7%+0.2%
- DFGX 0.20%, better
- MAMB 1.15%
- DFGX $1.93B
- MAMB $199M
- DFGX −0.7%
- MAMB +0.2%, better
- DFGX 4.93%, better
- MAMB 2.77%
- DFGX 822
- MAMB 10
- DFGX 218K sh, better
- MAMB 30.9K sh
- DFGX $51.64
- MAMB $23.42
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DFGX | MAMB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A95Higher | F0 |
| Mission | A87Higher | A70 |
| Risk | D33 | D37Higher |
| Tradability | B64Higher | C49 |
| Holdings | A79Higher | F24 |
| Durability | B57Higher | C43 |
Rank among Global Aggregate Bond (Unhedged) funds
Same Category. DFGX and MAMB are both graded against the same 28 Global Aggregate Bond (Unhedged) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DFGXA
MAMBD
In short
DFGX Dimensional's bond sleeve for everything outside the US: roughly 700 mostly developed-market issues at 0.20%, net of a waiver through February 28, 2027. Built to sit beside a US core, not re-buy it.
MAMB Most global bond funds buy bonds and sit still. MAMB tracks an index that reads employment data, sorts the economy into cycle phases, and reshuffles about a dozen bond ETFs monthly. A macro overlay in index clothing.
Stated mandate
DFGX The fund seeks to maximize total returns through income and capital appreciation.
MAMB The Fund seeks to replicate, before fees and expenses, the performance of the Monarch Ambassador Income Index. It invests at least 80% of assets in Index constituents and uses a replication-indexing strategy.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DFGX vs MAMB Holdings
How DFGX and MAMB differ
Two bond funds rarely hold the same issues.
Level by level
- Country17.9%
Sector
No Sector split for DFGX.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in DFGXMore in MAMB | DFGX | MAMB |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | MAMB +81.9 points | 16.0% | 97.9% |
| Japan | DFGX +18.9 points | 19.2% | 0.3% |
| Canada | DFGX +17.0 points | 17.4% | 0.4% |
| France | DFGX +8.8 points | 8.9% | 0.1% |
| United Kingdom | DFGX +8.6 points | 9.2% | 0.6% |
| Netherlands | DFGX +7.4 points | 7.5% | 0.1% |
| Australia | DFGX +4.2 points | 4.3% | 0.1% |
| New Zealand | DFGX +3.7 points | 3.7% | 0.0% |
| Other countries (25) | DFGX +13.1 points | 13.7% | 0.6% |
Outside the US: DFGX 100% developed, 0% emerging.
Concentration
- DFGX14.3%
- MAMB100.1%
- DFGX721
- MAMB9
Asset class
- DFGX
- Fixed Income
- MAMB
- Fixed Income
Holdings
Two bond funds rarely hold the same issues, so this page lists no shared Holdings. DFGX holds 721 securities, MAMB 9.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DFGX vs MAMB Cost
Overpaying MAMB vs DFGX
$16,922
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DFGX 0.20%
$4,155
MAMB 1.15%
$21,077
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DFGX | MAMB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $365 | $2,015 | $1,650 |
| 20 | $1,421 | $7,521 | $6,100 |
| 30 | $4,155 | $21,077 | $16,922 |
- 0.20%DFGX, cheaper
- 1.15%MAMB
- Middle half of Global Aggregate Bond (Unhedged) funds
- Median 0.40%
DFGX 2nd cheapest of 28 funds
MAMB 28th cheapest of 28 funds
DFGX vs MAMB Dividends
- DFGX 4.93%, better
- MAMB 2.77%
- DFGX $2.55
- MAMB $0.65
- DFGX $0.20
- MAMB $0.16
- DFGX Oct 20, 2026
- MAMB Sep 24, 2026
- DFGX Oct 22, 2026
- MAMB Sep 29, 2026
- DFGX Irregular
- MAMB Quarterly
Distribution history
DFGX vs MAMB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DFGX 4.1%MAMB 6.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- DFGX −0.16MAMB 0.37
- Worst fall
- DFGX −3.4%MAMB −19.1%
- Market sensitivity
- DFGX 0.20MAMB 1.12
Popular comparisons
- 0.20% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.15% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.15% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.15% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.