DFGP ranks 1st and MAMB 28th of 28 funds in the Global Aggregate Bond (Unhedged) Category.
DFGP vs MAMB
DFGP −0.93pt a year
0.22%1.15%
DFGP 13.7×the volume
425K30.9K
DFGP vs MAMB Performance
−0.1%+0.2%
- DFGP 0.22%, better
- MAMB 1.15%
- DFGP $3.79B
- MAMB $199M
- DFGP −0.1%
- MAMB +0.2%, better
- DFGP 4.85%, better
- MAMB 2.77%
- DFGP 1619
- MAMB 10
- DFGP 425K sh, better
- MAMB 30.9K sh
- DFGP $52.60
- MAMB $23.42
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DFGP | MAMB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A89Higher | F0 |
| Mission | A100Higher | A70 |
| Risk | C49Higher | D37 |
| Tradability | B65Higher | C49 |
| Holdings | A88Higher | F24 |
| Durability | B61Higher | C43 |
Rank among Global Aggregate Bond (Unhedged) funds
Same Category. DFGP and MAMB are both graded against the same 28 Global Aggregate Bond (Unhedged) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DFGPA
MAMBD
In short
DFGP Dimensional's global bond playbook in ETF form: roughly 1,300 US and foreign bonds, chosen by rules that chase credit and term premiums, at 0.22% net of a waiver through February 28, 2027.
MAMB Most global bond funds buy bonds and sit still. MAMB tracks an index that reads employment data, sorts the economy into cycle phases, and reshuffles about a dozen bond ETFs monthly. A macro overlay in index clothing.
Stated mandate
DFGP The fund seeks its objective through investments in U.S. and foreign fixed-income securities.
MAMB The Fund seeks to replicate, before fees and expenses, the performance of the Monarch Ambassador Income Index. It invests at least 80% of assets in Index constituents and uses a replication-indexing strategy.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DFGP vs MAMB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DFGP vs MAMB Cost
Overpaying MAMB vs DFGP
$16,519
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DFGP 0.22%
$4,558
MAMB 1.15%
$21,077
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DFGP | MAMB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $401 | $2,015 | $1,614 |
| 20 | $1,561 | $7,521 | $5,960 |
| 30 | $4,558 | $21,077 | $16,519 |
- 0.22%DFGP, cheaper
- 1.15%MAMB
- Middle half of Global Aggregate Bond (Unhedged) funds
- Median 0.40%
DFGP 4th cheapest of 28 funds
MAMB 28th cheapest of 28 funds
DFGP vs MAMB Dividends
- DFGP 4.85%, better
- MAMB 2.77%
- DFGP $2.56
- MAMB $0.65
- DFGP $0.25
- MAMB $0.16
- DFGP Oct 20, 2026
- MAMB Sep 24, 2026
- DFGP Oct 22, 2026
- MAMB Sep 29, 2026
- DFGP Irregular
- MAMB Quarterly
Distribution history
DFGP vs MAMB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DFGP 4.7%MAMB 6.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- DFGP 0.06MAMB 0.37
- Worst fall
- DFGP −3.9%MAMB −19.1%
- Market sensitivity
- DFGP 0.22MAMB 1.12
Popular comparisons
- 0.22% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.15% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.22% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.15% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.22% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.15% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.