GRNB ranks 2nd and MAMB 28th of 28 funds in the Global Aggregate Bond (Unhedged) Category.
GRNB vs MAMB
GRNB −0.95pt a year
0.20%1.15%
GRNB 1.1×the volume
34.2K30.9K
GRNB +0.5pt
+0.8%+0.3%
GRNB vs MAMB Performance
+4.0%+1.4%
- GRNB 0.20%, better
- MAMB 1.15%
- GRNB $196M
- MAMB $199M
- GRNB +0.2%
- MAMB +0.2%
- GRNB 4.52%, better
- MAMB 2.77%
- GRNB 475
- MAMB 10
- GRNB 34.2K sh, better
- MAMB 30.9K sh
- GRNB $23.46
- MAMB $23.42
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GRNB | MAMB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A95Higher | F0 |
| Mission | A93Higher | A70 |
| Risk | B65Higher | D37 |
| Tradability | D26 | C49Higher |
| Holdings | A100Higher | F24 |
| Durability | C48Higher | C43 |
Rank among Global Aggregate Bond (Unhedged) funds
Same Category. GRNB and MAMB are both graded against the same 28 Global Aggregate Bond (Unhedged) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GRNBA
MAMBD
In short
GRNB Its peer group is stacked with total-bond-market giants. GRNB goes narrow instead: only dollar-denominated green bonds funding environmental projects, issued worldwide by governments, supranationals and companies. A 2017-vintage specialist at 0.20%.
MAMB Most global bond funds buy bonds and sit still. MAMB tracks an index that reads employment data, sorts the economy into cycle phases, and reshuffles about a dozen bond ETFs monthly. A macro overlay in index clothing.
Stated mandate
GRNB The fund seeks to track the S&P Green Bond U.S. Dollar Select Index before fees and expenses. The index covers U.S.-dollar-denominated green bonds financing environmentally friendly projects and issued globally by supranational, government, and corporate entities.
MAMB The Fund seeks to replicate, before fees and expenses, the performance of the Monarch Ambassador Income Index. It invests at least 80% of assets in Index constituents and uses a replication-indexing strategy.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GRNB vs MAMB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GRNB vs MAMB Cost
Overpaying MAMB vs GRNB
$16,922
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GRNB 0.20%
$4,155
MAMB 1.15%
$21,077
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GRNB | MAMB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $365 | $2,015 | $1,650 |
| 20 | $1,421 | $7,521 | $6,100 |
| 30 | $4,155 | $21,077 | $16,922 |
- 0.20%GRNB, cheaper
- 1.15%MAMB
- Middle half of Global Aggregate Bond (Unhedged) funds
- Median 0.40%
GRNB 2nd cheapest of 28 funds
MAMB 28th cheapest of 28 funds
GRNB vs MAMB Dividends
- GRNB 4.52%, better
- MAMB 2.77%
- GRNB $1.06
- MAMB $0.65
- GRNB $0.09
- MAMB $0.16
- GRNB Oct 1, 2026
- MAMB Sep 24, 2026
- GRNB Oct 6, 2026
- MAMB Sep 29, 2026
- GRNB Monthly
- MAMB Quarterly
Distribution history
GRNB vs MAMB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- GRNB
- MAMB
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GRNB 4.4%, betterMAMB 6.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- GRNB 0.30MAMB 0.37, better
- Worst fall
- GRNB −16.4%, betterMAMB −19.1%
- Market sensitivity
- GRNB 0.69MAMB 1.12
Popular comparisons
- 0.20% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.15% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.15% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.15% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.