BOTT ranks 5th and HUMN 14th of 18 funds in the Robotics & Automation Category.
BOTT vs HUMN
BOTT −0.40pt a year
0.35%0.75%
HUMN 5.2×the volume
18.6K96.2K
BOTT vs HUMN Performance
−16.8%−13.7%
- BOTT 0.35%, better
- HUMN 0.75%
- BOTT $56M
- HUMN $85M
- BOTT −16.8%
- HUMN −13.7%, better
- BOTT 0.16%
- HUMN
- BOTT 39
- HUMN 45
- BOTT 18.6K sh
- HUMN 96.2K sh, better
- BOTT $35.49
- HUMN $27.05
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BOTT | HUMN |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97Higher | F18 |
| Mission | D37 | |
| Risk | F17 | D33Higher |
| Tradability | C45 | C53Higher |
| Holdings | B60 | B65Higher |
| Durability | D37 | B63Higher |
Rank among Robotics & Automation funds
Same Category. BOTT and HUMN are both graded against the same 18 Robotics & Automation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BOTTB
HUMND
In short
BOTT Most robotics funds buy the whole factory floor. BOTT buys the androids: about 30 global names across the humanoid and service robot value chain, at 0.35% a year.
HUMN The first US-listed ETF built purely around humanoid robots, live since 2025. Roundhill picks roughly 40 names actively, judging which companies are genuinely closest to building the machines rather than tracking an index.
Stated mandate
BOTT The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, an index of companies deriving significant revenue from designing and developing humanoid and service robots.
HUMN The actively managed ETF invests in equity securities of companies involved in humanoid robotics, including robots designed with human-like structures and functions and equipped with advanced sensors, artificial intelligence, and actuators.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BOTT vs HUMN Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BOTT vs HUMN Cost
Overpaying HUMN vs BOTT
$7,356
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BOTT 0.35%
$7,126
HUMN 0.75%
$14,482
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BOTT | HUMN | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $634 | $1,336 | $702 |
| 20 | $2,454 | $5,078 | $2,624 |
| 30 | $7,126 | $14,482 | $7,356 |
- 0.35%BOTT, cheaper
- 0.75%HUMN
- Middle half of Robotics & Automation funds
- Median 0.54%
BOTT cheapest of 18 funds
HUMN 14th cheapest of 18 funds
BOTT vs HUMN Dividends
- BOTT 0.16%
- HUMN
- BOTT $0.06
- HUMN
- BOTT $0.06
- HUMN $0.22
- BOTT Dec 18, 2025
- HUMN Dec 30, 2025
- BOTT Dec 19, 2025
- HUMN Dec 31, 2025
- BOTT Irregular
- HUMN Irregular
Distribution history
BOTT vs HUMN Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BOTT 36.2%HUMN 34.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- BOTT 0.43HUMN 0.21
- Worst fall
- BOTT −44.3%HUMN −34.0%
- Market sensitivity
- BOTT 1.60HUMN 2.40
BOTT and HUMN in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.35% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


