FBOT ranks 2nd and HUMN 14th of 18 funds in the Robotics & Automation Category.
FBOT vs HUMN
10.7%by weight
FBOT −0.25pt a year
0.50%0.75%
HUMN 6.9×the volume
13.9K96.2K
FBOT vs HUMN Performance
+8.4%−13.7%
- FBOT 0.50%, better
- HUMN 0.75%
- FBOT $213M
- HUMN $85M
- FBOT +8.4%, better
- HUMN −13.7%
- FBOT 0.42%
- HUMN
- FBOT 53
- HUMN 45
- FBOT 13.9K sh
- HUMN 96.2K sh, better
- FBOT $37.22
- HUMN $27.05
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FBOT | HUMN |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B65Higher | F18 |
| Mission | D37 | |
| Risk | A79Higher | D33 |
| Tradability | C52 | C53Higher |
| Holdings | A75Higher | B65 |
| Durability | A84Higher | B63 |
Rank among Robotics & Automation funds
Same Category. FBOT and HUMN are both graded against the same 18 Robotics & Automation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FBOTB
HUMND
In short
FBOT Most robotics funds hand the job to an index. FBOT hands it to Fidelity's analysts: about 50 global picks spanning industrial robots, machine vision, autonomous driving and 3D printing, for 0.50% a year.
HUMN The first US-listed ETF built purely around humanoid robots, live since 2025. Roundhill picks roughly 40 names actively, judging which companies are genuinely closest to building the machines rather than tracking an index.
Stated mandate
FBOT The fund seeks long-term capital growth by normally investing at least 80% of its assets in securities of disruptive automation companies.
HUMN The actively managed ETF invests in equity securities of companies involved in humanoid robotics, including robots designed with human-like structures and functions and equipped with advanced sensors, artificial intelligence, and actuators.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FBOT vs HUMN Holdings
How FBOT and HUMN differ
10.7%
Shared holdings make up 17.2% of FBOT and 12.9% of HUMN.
Level by level
- Holdings10.7%
- Country51.0%
- Sector81.5%
Sector
| Sector | More in FBOTMore in HUMN | FBOT | HUMN |
|---|---|---|---|
| Consumer Discretionary | HUMN +18.5 points | 3.8% | 22.3% |
| Technology | FBOT +8.4 points | 39.4% | 31.0% |
| Industrials | FBOT +6.4 points | 53.1% | 46.7% |
| Communication | FBOT +3.0 points | 3.0% | 0.0% |
| Health Care | FBOT +0.8 points | 0.8% | 0.0% |
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in FBOTMore in HUMN | FBOT | HUMN |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | FBOT +34.9 points | 53.5% | 18.6% |
| China | HUMN +31.9 points | 3.1% | 35.0% |
| South Korea | HUMN +14.9 points | 0.0% | 14.9% |
| Japan | FBOT +4.4 points | 19.0% | 14.6% |
| United Kingdom | FBOT +2.3 points | 2.3% | 0.0% |
| Taiwan | FBOT +2.1 points | 9.1% | 7.0% |
| Sweden | FBOT +1.8 points | 5.0% | 3.2% |
| France | FBOT +1.3 points | 1.3% | 0.0% |
| Other countries (4) | Same weight | 6.7% | 6.7% |
Outside the US: FBOT 74% developed, 26% emerging. HUMN 30% developed, 70% emerging.
Concentration
- FBOT39.4%
- HUMN49.6%
- FBOT49
- HUMN44
Asset class
- FBOT
- Equity
- HUMN
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in FBOT42
- In both7
- Only in HUMN37
Only in FBOT
42 securities, 83.4% of FBOT by weight
- Taiwan Semiconductor Mfg Co Lt5.57%
- Deere & Co5.45%
- Palantir Technologies Inc4.12%
- Axon Enterprise Inc3.48%
- Siemens AG (Regd)3.20%
- Ptc Inc3.19%
- Emerson Electric Co2.95%
- Keyence Corp2.66%
- Hexagon Ab Ser B2.61%
- Daifuku Co Ltd2.60%
- Alphabet Inc Class C2.45%
- Epiroc Ab Class A2.40%
- Manhattan Associates Inc2.34%
- Smc Corp2.32%
- Renishaw PLC Ord2.31%
- Recruit Holdings Co Ltd2.23%
- Misumi Group Inc2.20%
- Amazon.com Inc2.08%
- Airtac International Group1.96%
- Ametek Inc New1.74%
- Samsara Inc1.69%
- Bloom Energy Corp Class A1.66%
- Uber Technologies Inc1.65%
- Komatsu Ltd1.65%
- Rockwell Automation Inc1.60%
- Synopsys Inc1.58%
- Symbotic Inc1.37%
- Dassault Systemes SA1.33%
- Kardex AG Reg1.29%
- Microsoft Corp1.24%
- Securities Lending Cf1.16%
- Ats Corp1.15%
- Teledyne Technologies Inc1.14%
- Caterpillar Inc1.13%
- Beta Technologies Inc1.10%
- Byd Company Ltd H1.04%
- Autodesk Inc0.93%
- Rocket Lab Corp0.91%
- Intuitive Surgical Inc0.89%
- Estun Automation Co Ltd A0.68%
- Pony Ai Inc Adr0.35%
- European Monetary Unit (Euro)0.00%
Only in HUMN
37 securities, 85.8% of HUMN by weight
- United States Treasury Bill 12/03/202611.19%
- Tesla Inc4.51%
- Leader Harmonious Drive Systems Co Ltd4.31%
- Harmonic Drive Systems Inc4.13%
- UBTech Robotics Corp Ltd3.46%
- Robotis Co Ltd3.46%
- Rainbow Robotics3.38%
- Churchill Capital Corp XI3.24%
- Hexagon AB2.65%
- Hyundai Motor Co2.55%
- Doosan Robotics Inc2.51%
- Estun Automation Co Ltd2.34%
- Shenzhen Zhaowei Machinery & Electronic Co Ltd2.24%
- Minth Group Ltd2.20%
- ABB Ltd2.12%
- Shenzhen Dobot Corp Ltd2.07%
- Orbbec Inc2.06%
- China Leadshine Technology Co Ltd2.03%
- RoboSense Technology Co Ltd1.96%
- Nabtesco Corp1.87%
- Zhejiang Shuanghuan Driveline Co Ltd1.82%
- Ouster Inc1.79%
- Infineon Technologies AG1.79%
- XPeng Inc1.67%
- Ningbo Tuopu Group Co Ltd1.61%
- Zhejiang Sanhua Intelligent Controls Co Ltd1.58%
- Novanta Inc1.55%
- Kawasaki Heavy Industries Ltd1.53%
- Ambarella Inc1.45%
- Schaeffler AG1.42%
- Yaskawa Electric Corp1.34%
- Vishay Precision Group Inc1.33%
- Xiaomi Corp1.22%
- Allient Inc1.21%
- First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/20310.14%
- Euro0.02%
- New Taiwan Dollar0.00%
Weight gaps
All 7 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.
| Holding | More in FBOTMore in HUMN | FBOT | HUMN |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp | FBOT +2.56 points | 4.88% | 2.32% |
| Thk Co Ltd | FBOT +1.67 points | 2.92% | 1.25% |
| Teradyne Inc | FBOT +1.63 points | 3.61% | 1.98% |
| Hesai Group Adr | HUMN +1.56 points | 0.37% | 1.93% |
| Fanuc Corporation | FBOT +0.73 points | 2.28% | 1.55% |
| Hiwin Technologies Corp | HUMN +0.50 points | 1.53% | 2.03% |
| Shenzhen Inovance Tec Co Ltd A | HUMN +0.17 points | 1.65% | 1.82% |
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FBOT vs HUMN Cost
Overpaying HUMN vs FBOT
$4,503
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FBOT 0.50%
$9,979
HUMN 0.75%
$14,482
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FBOT | HUMN | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $1,336 | $436 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $5,078 | $1,618 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $14,482 | $4,503 |
- 0.50%FBOT, cheaper
- 0.75%HUMN
- Middle half of Robotics & Automation funds
- Median 0.54%
FBOT 7th cheapest of 18 funds
HUMN 14th cheapest of 18 funds
FBOT vs HUMN Dividends
- FBOT 0.42%
- HUMN
- FBOT $0.16
- HUMN
- FBOT $0.03
- HUMN $0.22
- FBOT Sep 18, 2026
- HUMN Dec 30, 2025
- FBOT Sep 22, 2026
- HUMN Dec 31, 2025
- FBOT Twice a year
- HUMN Irregular
Distribution history
FBOT vs HUMN Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FBOT 18.8%HUMN 34.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- FBOT 0.89HUMN 0.21
- Worst fall
- FBOT −23.6%HUMN −34.0%
- Market sensitivity
- FBOT 1.30HUMN 2.40
FBOT and HUMN in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


