Skip to content
etf.net

BREW vs LOGO

Corgi Coffee & Energy Drinks ETF

BREWCCboe

Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF

LOGOCNasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

BREW −0.34pt a year

BREW0.35%LOGO0.69%

Avg volume · 30D

LOGO 2.9×the volume

BREW814LOGO2.35K

BREW vs LOGO Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Nov 2, 2026

+2.3%BREW−2.2%LOGO

Jul 31, 2026 to Nov 2, 2026. BREW +2.3%. LOGO −2.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−7.5%−5%0%5%Jul 2026Sep 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
BREW 0.35%, better
LOGO 0.69%
Fund size
BREW $1M
LOGO $32M
1Y total return
BREW No data
LOGO −7.6%
Holdings
BREW 21
LOGO 46
Avg volume (30D)
BREW 814 sh
LOGO 2.35K sh, better
NAV per share
BREW $27.68
LOGO $19.89
52W range

ETF.net Grade

BREW: Cost 90, Risk 80, Mission not scored, Tradability 33, Holdings 32, Durability 20. LOGO: Cost 12, Risk 43, Mission not scored, Tradability 66, Holdings 84, Durability 54.
Pillar letters and Scores for BREW, LOGO, with each pillar’s weight
PillarBREWLOGO
Cost30% weightA90HigherF12
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightA80HigherC43
Tradability15% weightD33B66Higher
Holdings10% weightD32A84Higher
Durability5% weightF20C54Higher

Rank among Consumer Lifestyle funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. BREW and LOGO are both graded against the same 10 Consumer Lifestyle funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Consumer Lifestyle⁠

Category · 10 funds
See all 10 ›

LOGO ranks 6th and BREW 7th of 10 funds in the Consumer Lifestyle Category.

  1. Rank 5CEMCGlobal X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETFScore 42
  2. Rank 6CLOGOAlpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETFScore 41
  3. Rank 7CBREWCorgi Coffee & Energy Drinks ETFScore 40
  4. Rank 7CSTYLCorgi Lifestyle Brands ETFScore 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

BREWCCorgi Coffee & Energy Drinks ETF

LOGOCAlpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF

In short

BREW No data

LOGO Most consumer-theme funds ride the upswing and wear the downswing. LOGO writes both sides into its objective: long-term capital appreciation, plus an aim to preserve capital when conditions turn adverse. A young, focused take on where people spend.

Stated mandate

BREW No data

LOGO The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation and also seeks to preserve capital during adverse market conditions.

Why people hold it

BREW No data

  • LOGO Unusual mandate for a theme fund: it seeks long-term capital appreciation and also aims to preserve capital in adverse markets. Defense sits in the prospectus, not just the pitch.
  • One clear job: equity in companies serving consumption-focused industries. The brands and retailers people actually spend at, not a grab bag of loosely related names.
  • Plain 1940 Act fund structure. No K-1 at tax time, no issuer credit risk tucked behind a note.

Worth knowing

BREW No data

  • LOGO At 0.69% a year it prices above the middle of its consumer-lifestyle peer group, where MILN and PAWZ both charge 0.50%.
  • Launched in 2025, still small and thinly traded. Spreads can widen, and the performance record is short enough that risk readings carry low confidence.
  • Income isn't the point: the stated goal is capital appreciation, and the fund has not established a distribution schedule.

Full BREW profile⁠

Full LOGO profile⁠

BREW vs LOGO Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

BREW vs LOGO Cost

Overpaying LOGO vs BREW

$6,303

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • BREW 0.35%

    $7,126

  • LOGO 0.69%

    $13,429

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • BREW 0.35%
  • LOGO 0.69%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530LOGO $13,429BREW $7,126

Year by year

YearBREWLOGOOverpaying
10$634$1,232$598
20$2,454$4,697$2,243
30$7,126$13,429$6,303

Expense ratio

  • 0.35%BREW, cheaper
  • 0.69%LOGO
  • Middle half of Consumer Lifestyle funds
  • Median 0.54%

BREW cheapest of 10 funds

LOGO 9th cheapest of 10 funds

BREW vs LOGO Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Payout (12M)
BREW None
LOGO None

Distribution history

BREWAll BREW payments⁠

No distribution history available.

LOGOAll LOGO payments⁠

No distribution history available.

BREW vs LOGO Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
BREW No dataLOGO 12.4%since Jun 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
BREW No dataLOGO −0.29since Jun 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
BREW No dataLOGO −18.4%since May 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
BREW −0.80LOGO 0.96

Popular comparisons

  • BREWCvsMILNB

    Corgi Coffee & Energy Drinks ETF · Global X Millennial Consumer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • LOGOCvsMILNB

    Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF · Global X Millennial Consumer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • BREWCvsPEJB

    Corgi Coffee & Energy Drinks ETF · Invesco Dynamic Leisure and Entertainment ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.58%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • LOGOCvsPEJB

    Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF · Invesco Dynamic Leisure and Entertainment ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.58%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • BREWCvsPAWZC

    Corgi Coffee & Energy Drinks ETF · ProShares Pet Care ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • LOGOCvsPAWZC

    Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF · ProShares Pet Care ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.