Skip to content

LOGO vs PEJ

Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF

LOGOCNasdaq

Invesco Dynamic Leisure and Entertainment ETF

PEJBNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

PEJ −0.11pt a year

LOGO0.69%PEJ0.58%

Avg volume · 30D

PEJ 26.1×the volume

LOGO2.35KPEJ61.3K

LOGO vs PEJ Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Nov 2, 2026

−7.6%LOGO+15.6%PEJ

Oct 31, 2025 to Nov 2, 2026. LOGO −7.6%. PEJ +15.6%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%5%10%20%Oct 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
LOGO 0.69%
PEJ 0.58%, better
Fund size
LOGO $32M
PEJ $358M
1Y total return
LOGO −7.6%
PEJ +15.6%, better
Yield (12M)
LOGO No data
PEJ 0.50%
Holdings
LOGO 46
PEJ 32
Avg volume (30D)
LOGO 2.35K sh
PEJ 61.3K sh, better
NAV per share
LOGO $19.89
PEJ $66.44
52W range

ETF.net Grade

LOGO: Cost 12, Risk 43, Mission not scored, Tradability 66, Holdings 84, Durability 54. PEJ: Cost 46, Risk 65, Mission not scored, Tradability 86, Holdings 69, Durability 90.
Pillar letters and Scores for LOGO, PEJ, with each pillar’s weight
PillarLOGOPEJ
Cost30% weightF12C46Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC43B65Higher
Tradability15% weightB66A86Higher
Holdings10% weightA84HigherB69
Durability5% weightC54A90Higher

Rank among Consumer Lifestyle funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. LOGO and PEJ are both graded against the same 10 Consumer Lifestyle funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Consumer Lifestyle⁠

Category · 10 funds
See all 10 ›

PEJ ranks 2nd and LOGO 6th of 10 funds in the Consumer Lifestyle Category.

  1. Rank 1BMILNGlobal X Millennial Consumer ETFScore 67
  2. Rank 2BPEJInvesco Dynamic Leisure and Entertainment ETFScore 63
  3. Rank 3CPAWZProShares Pet Care ETFScore 53
  4. Rank 5CEMCGlobal X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETFScore 42
  5. Rank 6CLOGOAlpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETFScore 41
  6. Rank 7CBREWCorgi Coffee & Energy Drinks ETFScore 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

LOGOCAlpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF

PEJBInvesco Dynamic Leisure and Entertainment ETF

In short

LOGO Most consumer-theme funds ride the upswing and wear the downswing. LOGO writes both sides into its objective: long-term capital appreciation, plus an aim to preserve capital when conditions turn adverse. A young, focused take on where people spend.

PEJ The travel-and-fun trade, run like a quant screen: roughly 30 US leisure and entertainment stocks re-ranked every quarter on momentum, quality, management action and value. Fee is 0.58%, with no waiver doing the work. Trading since 2005.

Stated mandate

LOGO The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation and also seeks to preserve capital during adverse market conditions.

PEJ The fund seeks capital appreciation through an index that evaluates companies using multiple investment-merit criteria.

Why people hold it

  • LOGO Unusual mandate for a theme fund: it seeks long-term capital appreciation and also aims to preserve capital in adverse markets. Defense sits in the prospectus, not just the pitch.
  • One clear job: equity in companies serving consumption-focused industries. The brands and retailers people actually spend at, not a grab bag of loosely related names.
  • Plain 1940 Act fund structure. No K-1 at tax time, no issuer credit risk tucked behind a note.
  • PEJ Nearly two decades of live history, through a full shutdown-and-reopening cycle for travel, make this one of the originals in the niche and a strong one in its peer group.
  • The index skips the usual mega-cap tilt: the eight largest constituents share 40% of the weight while 22 smaller names split 60%, so mid-size operators actually move the needle.sec.gov
  • Holdings get re-screened quarterly on price momentum, earnings momentum, quality, management action and value, so names keep having to earn their slot.invesco.com
  • Moderately traded for such a narrow theme, which makes getting in and out less of a chore, and it pays distributions quarterly.

Worth knowing

  • LOGO At 0.69% a year it prices above the middle of its consumer-lifestyle peer group, where MILN and PAWZ both charge 0.50%.
  • Launched in 2025, still small and thinly traded. Spreads can widen, and the performance record is short enough that risk readings carry low confidence.
  • Income isn't the point: the stated goal is capital appreciation, and the fund has not established a distribution schedule.
  • PEJ Concentration is the point and the trade-off: about 30 stocks inside one corner of consumer discretionary, with no other sector to cushion a rough stretch for leisure spending.
  • Quarterly reconstitution means real turnover. What the fund holds in February may look different by November, so this is not a buy-it-and-forget-the-names basket.sec.gov
  • At 0.58% it sits near the typical fee for consumer-lifestyle thematics, and above the group's cheapest options: MILN and PAWZ each charge 0.50%, also without a waiver.

Full LOGO profile⁠

Full PEJ profile⁠

LOGO vs PEJ Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

LOGO vs PEJ Cost

Overpaying LOGO vs PEJ

$1,976

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • LOGO 0.69%

    $13,429

  • PEJ 0.58%

    $11,453

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • LOGO 0.69%
  • PEJ 0.58%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530LOGO $13,429PEJ $11,453

Year by year

YearLOGOPEJOverpaying
10$1,232$1,041$191
20$4,697$3,986$711
30$13,429$11,453$1,976

Expense ratio

  • 0.69%LOGO
  • 0.58%PEJ, cheaper
  • Middle half of Consumer Lifestyle funds
  • Median 0.54%

PEJ 6th cheapest of 10 funds

LOGO 9th cheapest of 10 funds

LOGO vs PEJ Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
LOGO No data
PEJ 0.50%
Payout (12M)
LOGO None
PEJ $0.34
Last payment
LOGO No data
PEJ $0.06
Ex-dividend
LOGO No data
PEJ Sep 21, 2026
Paid on
LOGO No data
PEJ Sep 25, 2026
Frequency
LOGO No data
PEJ Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

LOGOAll LOGO payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PEJQuarterly · 32 paymentsAll PEJ payments⁠
One bar per payment. 32 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Jun 16, 2017 $0.26; Sep 18, 2017 $0.03; Mar 19, 2018 $0.08; Jun 18, 2018 $0.10; Sep 24, 2018 $0.06; Dec 24, 2018 $0.07; Jun 24, 2019 $0.07; Sep 23, 2019 $0.03; Dec 23, 2019 $0.07; Mar 23, 2020 $0.07; Jun 22, 2020 $0.02; Dec 21, 2020 $0.28; Mar 22, 2021 $0.02; Jun 21, 2021 $0.01; Sep 20, 2021 $0.06; Dec 20, 2021 $0.07; Mar 21, 2022 $0.07; Jun 21, 2022 $0.06; Sep 19, 2022 $0.008; Dec 19, 2022 $0.03; Mar 20, 2023 $0.14; Jun 20, 2023 $0.03; Sep 18, 2023 $0.02; Mar 18, 2024 $0.17; Jun 24, 2024 $0.0057; Sep 23, 2024 $0.03; Mar 24, 2025 $0.02; Sep 22, 2025 $0.05; Dec 22, 2025 $0.07; Mar 23, 2026 $0.12; Jun 22, 2026 $0.09; Sep 21, 2026 $0.06. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252017202020232026YTD

LOGO vs PEJ Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
LOGO 12.4%since Jun 2025PEJ 16.9%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
LOGO −0.29since Jun 2025PEJ 1.08
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
LOGO −18.4%since May 2025PEJ −34.7%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
LOGO 0.96PEJ 1.10

Popular comparisons

  • LOGOCvsMILNB

    Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF · Global X Millennial Consumer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PEJBvsMILNB

    Invesco Dynamic Leisure and Entertainment ETF · Global X Millennial Consumer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.58% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LOGOCvsPAWZC

    Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF · ProShares Pet Care ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PEJBvsPAWZC

    Invesco Dynamic Leisure and Entertainment ETF · ProShares Pet Care ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.58% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LOGOCvsGENZC

    Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF · VanEck Digital Native Economy ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.51%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PEJBvsGENZC

    Invesco Dynamic Leisure and Entertainment ETF · VanEck Digital Native Economy ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.58% · 0.51%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.