PAWZ ranks 3rd and LOGO 6th of 10 funds in the Consumer Lifestyle Category.
LOGO vs PAWZ
PAWZ −0.19pt a year
0.69%0.50%
LOGO 1.3×the volume
2.35K1.74K
LOGO vs PAWZ Performance
−7.6%+1.5%
- LOGO 0.69%
- PAWZ 0.50%, better
- LOGO $32M
- PAWZ $33M
- LOGO −7.6%
- PAWZ +1.5%, better
- LOGO
- PAWZ 0.67%
- LOGO 46
- PAWZ 28
- LOGO 2.35K sh, better
- PAWZ 1.74K sh
- LOGO $19.89
- PAWZ $52.22
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | LOGO | PAWZ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F12 | A70Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C43 | C46Higher |
| Tradability | B66Higher | C52 |
| Holdings | A84Higher | F16 |
| Durability | C54 | B62Higher |
Rank among Consumer Lifestyle funds
Same Category. LOGO and PAWZ are both graded against the same 10 Consumer Lifestyle funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
LOGOC
PAWZC
In short
LOGO Most consumer-theme funds ride the upswing and wear the downswing. LOGO writes both sides into its objective: long-term capital appreciation, plus an aim to preserve capital when conditions turn adverse. A young, focused take on where people spend.
PAWZ One ticker for the pet economy: vet clinics, kibble makers, animal-health labs, the retailers that ship it all. PAWZ has tracked the FactSet Pet Care Index, globally, since 2018.
Stated mandate
LOGO The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation and also seeks to preserve capital during adverse market conditions.
PAWZ The fund invests globally in companies positioned at the forefront of the pet care industry.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
LOGO vs PAWZ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
LOGO vs PAWZ Cost
Overpaying LOGO vs PAWZ
$3,450
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
LOGO 0.69%
$13,429
PAWZ 0.50%
$9,979
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | LOGO | PAWZ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,232 | $900 | $332 |
| 20 | $4,697 | $3,460 | $1,237 |
| 30 | $13,429 | $9,979 | $3,450 |
- 0.69%LOGO
- 0.50%PAWZ, cheaper
- Middle half of Consumer Lifestyle funds
- Median 0.54%
PAWZ 3rd cheapest of 10 funds
LOGO 9th cheapest of 10 funds
LOGO vs PAWZ Dividends
- LOGO
- PAWZ 0.67%
- LOGO None
- PAWZ $0.36
- LOGO
- PAWZ $0.06
- LOGO
- PAWZ Sep 23, 2026
- LOGO
- PAWZ Sep 29, 2026
- LOGO
- PAWZ Quarterly
Distribution history
LOGO vs PAWZ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- LOGO 12.4%PAWZ 21.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- LOGO −0.29PAWZ 0.24
- Worst fall
- LOGO −18.4%PAWZ −50.1%
- Market sensitivity
- LOGO 0.96PAWZ 1.05
Popular comparisons
- 0.69% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.58%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.58%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.51%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.51%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.