Skip to content

LOGO vs PAWZ

Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF

LOGOCNasdaq

ProShares Pet Care ETF

PAWZCCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

PAWZ −0.19pt a year

LOGO0.69%PAWZ0.50%

Avg volume · 30D

LOGO 1.3×the volume

LOGO2.35KPAWZ1.74K

LOGO vs PAWZ Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Nov 2, 2026

−7.6%LOGO+1.5%PAWZ

Oct 31, 2025 to Nov 2, 2026. LOGO −7.6%. PAWZ +1.5%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−15%−10%−5%5%Oct 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
LOGO 0.69%
PAWZ 0.50%, better
Fund size
LOGO $32M
PAWZ $33M
1Y total return
LOGO −7.6%
PAWZ +1.5%, better
Yield (12M)
LOGO No data
PAWZ 0.67%
Holdings
LOGO 46
PAWZ 28
Avg volume (30D)
LOGO 2.35K sh, better
PAWZ 1.74K sh
NAV per share
LOGO $19.89
PAWZ $52.22
52W range

ETF.net Grade

LOGO: Cost 12, Risk 43, Mission not scored, Tradability 66, Holdings 84, Durability 54. PAWZ: Cost 70, Risk 46, Mission not scored, Tradability 52, Holdings 16, Durability 62.
Pillar letters and Scores for LOGO, PAWZ, with each pillar’s weight
PillarLOGOPAWZ
Cost30% weightF12A70Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC43C46Higher
Tradability15% weightB66HigherC52
Holdings10% weightA84HigherF16
Durability5% weightC54B62Higher

Rank among Consumer Lifestyle funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. LOGO and PAWZ are both graded against the same 10 Consumer Lifestyle funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Consumer Lifestyle⁠

Category · 10 funds
See all 10 ›

PAWZ ranks 3rd and LOGO 6th of 10 funds in the Consumer Lifestyle Category.

  1. Rank 1BMILNGlobal X Millennial Consumer ETFScore 67
  2. Rank 2BPEJInvesco Dynamic Leisure and Entertainment ETFScore 63
  3. Rank 3CPAWZProShares Pet Care ETFScore 53
  4. Rank 4CGENZVanEck Digital Native Economy ETFScore 44
  5. Rank 5CEMCGlobal X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETFScore 42
  6. Rank 6CLOGOAlpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETFScore 41
  7. Rank 7CBREWCorgi Coffee & Energy Drinks ETFScore 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

LOGOCAlpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF

PAWZCProShares Pet Care ETF

In short

LOGO Most consumer-theme funds ride the upswing and wear the downswing. LOGO writes both sides into its objective: long-term capital appreciation, plus an aim to preserve capital when conditions turn adverse. A young, focused take on where people spend.

PAWZ One ticker for the pet economy: vet clinics, kibble makers, animal-health labs, the retailers that ship it all. PAWZ has tracked the FactSet Pet Care Index, globally, since 2018.

Stated mandate

LOGO The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation and also seeks to preserve capital during adverse market conditions.

PAWZ The fund invests globally in companies positioned at the forefront of the pet care industry.

Why people hold it

  • LOGO Unusual mandate for a theme fund: it seeks long-term capital appreciation and also aims to preserve capital in adverse markets. Defense sits in the prospectus, not just the pitch.
  • One clear job: equity in companies serving consumption-focused industries. The brands and retailers people actually spend at, not a grab bag of loosely related names.
  • Plain 1940 Act fund structure. No K-1 at tax time, no issuer credit risk tucked behind a note.
  • PAWZ Costs 0.50% a year, under the 0.65% median for its consumer-lifestyle peer group. Cheap for a niche theme fund, where 0.60%-plus is the norm.
  • Buys the whole pet supply chain, not one slice: the mandate is global companies at the forefront of pet care, set by the FactSet Pet Care Index rather than a manager's hunches.proshares.com
  • Running since 2018 and priced level with the strongest names in its cohort (MILN at 0.50%), it sits in the upper half of that peer group on our review.

Worth knowing

  • LOGO At 0.69% a year it prices above the middle of its consumer-lifestyle peer group, where MILN and PAWZ both charge 0.50%.
  • Launched in 2025, still small and thinly traded. Spreads can widen, and the performance record is short enough that risk readings carry low confidence.
  • Income isn't the point: the stated goal is capital appreciation, and the fund has not established a distribution schedule.
  • PAWZ Thinly traded. On a given trade the bid-ask spread can cost more than a year of the expense ratio, so how you place the order matters.
  • Around two dozen holdings. Concentration is the point of a theme fund and also the risk: one company's news can swing the whole basket.
  • A small fund with a global mandate, so expect foreign listings, currency movement, and an asset base that keeps it off most institutional buy lists.

Full LOGO profile⁠

Full PAWZ profile⁠

LOGO vs PAWZ Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

LOGO vs PAWZ Cost

Overpaying LOGO vs PAWZ

$3,450

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • LOGO 0.69%

    $13,429

  • PAWZ 0.50%

    $9,979

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • LOGO 0.69%
  • PAWZ 0.50%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530LOGO $13,429PAWZ $9,979

Year by year

YearLOGOPAWZOverpaying
10$1,232$900$332
20$4,697$3,460$1,237
30$13,429$9,979$3,450

Expense ratio

  • 0.69%LOGO
  • 0.50%PAWZ, cheaper
  • Middle half of Consumer Lifestyle funds
  • Median 0.54%

PAWZ 3rd cheapest of 10 funds

LOGO 9th cheapest of 10 funds

LOGO vs PAWZ Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
LOGO No data
PAWZ 0.67%
Payout (12M)
LOGO None
PAWZ $0.36
Last payment
LOGO No data
PAWZ $0.06
Ex-dividend
LOGO No data
PAWZ Sep 23, 2026
Paid on
LOGO No data
PAWZ Sep 29, 2026
Frequency
LOGO No data
PAWZ Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2018 to 2026, same scale for both

LOGOAll LOGO payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PAWZQuarterly · 30 paymentsAll PAWZ payments⁠
One bar per payment. 30 payments from 2018 to 2026 YTD. Dec 26, 2018 $0.03; Mar 20, 2019 $0.02; Jun 25, 2019 $0.09; Dec 24, 2019 $0.05; Mar 25, 2020 $0.01; Jun 24, 2020 $0.02; Sep 23, 2020 $0.03; Dec 23, 2020 $0.04; Mar 23, 2021 $0.03; Jun 22, 2021 $0.06; Sep 22, 2021 $0.01; Dec 23, 2021 $0.05; Mar 23, 2022 $0.04; Jun 22, 2022 $0.05; Sep 21, 2022 $0.06; Dec 22, 2022 $0.11; Mar 22, 2023 $0.04; Jun 21, 2023 $0.05; Sep 20, 2023 $0.09; Dec 20, 2023 $0.05; Jun 26, 2024 $0.18; Sep 25, 2024 $0.03; Dec 23, 2024 $0.13; Mar 26, 2025 $0.07; Jun 25, 2025 $0.24; Sep 24, 2025 $0.04; Dec 24, 2025 $0.09; Mar 25, 2026 $0.05; Jun 24, 2026 $0.17; Sep 23, 2026 $0.06. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.25202020232026YTD

LOGO vs PAWZ Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
LOGO 12.4%since Jun 2025PAWZ 21.3%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
LOGO −0.29since Jun 2025PAWZ 0.24
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
LOGO −18.4%since May 2025PAWZ −50.1%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
LOGO 0.96PAWZ 1.05

Popular comparisons

  • LOGOCvsMILNB

    Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF · Global X Millennial Consumer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PAWZCvsMILNB

    ProShares Pet Care ETF · Global X Millennial Consumer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LOGOCvsPEJB

    Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF · Invesco Dynamic Leisure and Entertainment ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.58%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PAWZCvsPEJB

    ProShares Pet Care ETF · Invesco Dynamic Leisure and Entertainment ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.58%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LOGOCvsGENZC

    Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF · VanEck Digital Native Economy ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.51%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PAWZCvsGENZC

    ProShares Pet Care ETF · VanEck Digital Native Economy ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.51%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.