IBHJ ranks 3rd and BSJT 10th of 21 funds in the Defined-Maturity High Yield Category.
BSJT vs IBHJ
IBHJ −0.07pt a year
0.42%0.35%
BSJT 3.0×the volume
139K45.9K
BSJT +0.1pt
+8.2%+8.1%
BSJT vs IBHJ Performance
+3.0%+2.6%
- BSJT 0.42%
- IBHJ 0.35%, better
- BSJT $603M
- IBHJ $201M
- BSJT +3.0%, better
- IBHJ +2.6%
- BSJT 6.63%
- IBHJ 7.44%, better
- BSJT 309
- IBHJ 287
- BSJT 139K sh, better
- IBHJ 45.9K sh
- BSJT $20.65
- IBHJ $25.50
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BSJT | IBHJ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F23 | A85Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C41 | B55Higher |
| Tradability | A73Higher | D34 |
| Holdings | A74 | A97Higher |
| Durability | A71Higher | B69 |
Rank among Defined-Maturity High Yield funds
Same Category. BSJT and IBHJ are both graded against the same 21 Defined-Maturity High Yield funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BSJTB
IBHJA
In short
BSJT A junk-bond rung with a date on it. BSJT holds US high-yield corporate bonds whose effective maturities land in 2029, so you get a dated slice of credit instead of an open-ended bond fund.
IBHJ A junk-bond fund with an end date. IBHJ holds roughly 300 high-yield corporate bonds all maturing around 2030, then winds up and pays out: the maturity-date discipline of a single bond, spread across a portfolio.
Stated mandate
BSJT The fund is designed to provide exposure to US dollar-denominated high-yield corporate bonds whose effective maturities fall in 2029.
IBHJ The fund seeks to track an index of high-yield and income-generating corporate bonds maturing in 2030.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BSJT vs IBHJ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BSJT vs IBHJ Cost
Overpaying BSJT vs IBHJ
$1,346
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BSJT 0.42%
$8,472
IBHJ 0.35%
$7,126
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BSJT | IBHJ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $759 | $634 | $125 |
| 20 | $2,927 | $2,454 | $473 |
| 30 | $8,472 | $7,126 | $1,346 |
- 0.42%BSJT
- 0.35%IBHJ, cheaper
- Middle half of Defined-Maturity High Yield funds
- Median 0.39%
IBHJ cheapest of 21 funds
BSJT 13th cheapest of 21 funds
BSJT vs IBHJ Dividends
- BSJT 6.63%
- IBHJ 7.44%, better
- BSJT $1.37
- IBHJ $1.89
- BSJT $0.11
- IBHJ $0.15
- BSJT Oct 19, 2026
- IBHJ Nov 2, 2026
- BSJT Oct 23, 2026
- IBHJ Pays Nov 5, 2026
- BSJT Monthly
- IBHJ Monthly
Distribution history
BSJT vs IBHJ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BSJT 5.0%IBHJ 5.0%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Return per unit of risk
- BSJT 0.86IBHJ 0.88, better
- Worst fall
- BSJT −19.4%IBHJ −4.9%
- Market sensitivity
- BSJT 0.70IBHJ 0.76
Popular comparisons
- 0.42% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.42% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.42% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.