IBHG ranks 3rd and BSJT 10th of 21 funds in the Defined-Maturity High Yield Category.
BSJT vs IBHG
IBHG −0.07pt a year
0.42%0.35%
BSJT 1.1×the volume
139K127K
IBHG +0.7pt
+2.9%+3.6%
BSJT vs IBHG Performance
+15.5%+19.5%
- BSJT 0.42%
- IBHG 0.35%, better
- BSJT $603M
- IBHG $532M
- BSJT +3.0%, better
- IBHG +2.8%
- BSJT 6.63%, better
- IBHG 6.38%
- BSJT 309
- IBHG 395
- BSJT 139K sh, better
- IBHG 127K sh
- BSJT $20.65
- IBHG $21.73
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BSJT | IBHG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F23 | A85Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C41 | B65Higher |
| Tradability | A73Higher | B61 |
| Holdings | A74Higher | D30 |
| Durability | A71 | A81Higher |
Rank among Defined-Maturity High Yield funds
Same Category. BSJT and IBHG are both graded against the same 21 Defined-Maturity High Yield funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BSJTB
IBHGA
In short
BSJT A junk-bond rung with a date on it. BSJT holds US high-yield corporate bonds whose effective maturities land in 2029, so you get a dated slice of credit instead of an open-ended bond fund.
IBHG Most target-maturity bond ETFs stick to Treasuries and investment grade. IBHG runs the same ladder-rung playbook in high yield: a basket of dollar-denominated junk and other income bonds all maturing in 2027.
Stated mandate
BSJT The fund is designed to provide exposure to US dollar-denominated high-yield corporate bonds whose effective maturities fall in 2029.
IBHG The fund seeks to track an index of U.S.-dollar-denominated, high-yield and other income-generating corporate bonds maturing in 2027.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BSJT vs IBHG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BSJT vs IBHG Cost
Overpaying BSJT vs IBHG
$1,346
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BSJT 0.42%
$8,472
IBHG 0.35%
$7,126
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BSJT | IBHG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $759 | $634 | $125 |
| 20 | $2,927 | $2,454 | $473 |
| 30 | $8,472 | $7,126 | $1,346 |
- 0.42%BSJT
- 0.35%IBHG, cheaper
- Middle half of Defined-Maturity High Yield funds
- Median 0.39%
IBHG cheapest of 21 funds
BSJT 13th cheapest of 21 funds
BSJT vs IBHG Dividends
- BSJT 6.63%, better
- IBHG 6.38%
- BSJT $1.37
- IBHG $1.38
- BSJT $0.11
- IBHG $0.10
- BSJT Oct 19, 2026
- IBHG Nov 2, 2026
- BSJT Oct 23, 2026
- IBHG Pays Nov 5, 2026
- BSJT Monthly
- IBHG Monthly
Distribution history
BSJT vs IBHG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- BSJT
- IBHG
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BSJT 5.0%IBHG 3.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- BSJT 0.86IBHG 1.00, better
- Worst fall
- BSJT −19.4%IBHG −13.9%, better
- Market sensitivity
- BSJT 0.70IBHG 0.47
Popular comparisons
- 0.42% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.42% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.42% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.