IBMR ranks 3rd and BSMQ 17th of 32 funds in the Defined-Maturity Municipal Category.
BSMQ vs IBMR
IBMR −0.08pt a year
0.18%0.10%
IBMR 2.1×the volume
50K105K
IBMR +0.8pt
+3.7%+4.5%
BSMQ vs IBMR Performance
+2.2%+1.6%
- BSMQ 0.18%
- IBMR 0.10%, better
- BSMQ $252M
- IBMR $527M
- BSMQ +2.2%, better
- IBMR +1.6%
- BSMQ 2.76%, better
- IBMR 2.54%
- BSMQ 1004
- IBMR 2071
- BSMQ 50K sh
- IBMR 105K sh, better
- BSMQ $23.52
- IBMR $25.16
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BSMQ | IBMR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C45 | A87Higher |
| Mission | A96 | |
| Risk | B63Higher | C54 |
| Tradability | B55 | A83Higher |
| Holdings | F23 | A89Higher |
| Durability | A76 | A85Higher |
Rank among Defined-Maturity Municipal funds
Same Category. BSMQ and IBMR are both graded against the same 32 Defined-Maturity Municipal funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BSMQC
IBMRA
In short
BSMQ One rung of a muni ladder in a single ticker: roughly 1,200 investment-grade municipal bonds, monthly distributions, and a built-in end date, with the fund set to terminate on or about Dec. 15, 2026 and pay out its net assets in cash.
IBMR A muni ladder rung in one ticker: it holds investment-grade municipal bonds maturing in 2029, tracks an AMT-free index, and pays monthly. Bond-style term structure, ETF plumbing.
Stated mandate
BSMQ The fund seeks to track the Invesco BulletShares Municipal Bond 2026 Index by investing at least 80% of total assets in its municipal bonds. The portfolio is designed to mature in 2026 and terminate around December 15, 2026.
IBMR The fund seeks to track an index of investment-grade municipal bonds that mature in 2029.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BSMQ vs IBMR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BSMQ vs IBMR Cost
Overpaying BSMQ vs IBMR
$1,643
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BSMQ 0.18%
$3,749
IBMR 0.10%
$2,106
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BSMQ | IBMR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $328 | $183 | $145 |
| 20 | $1,281 | $717 | $564 |
| 30 | $3,749 | $2,106 | $1,643 |
- 0.18%BSMQ
- 0.10%IBMR, cheaper
- Middle half of Defined-Maturity Municipal funds
- Median 0.18%
IBMR cheapest of 32 funds
BSMQ 10th cheapest of 32 funds
BSMQ vs IBMR Dividends
- BSMQ 2.76%, better
- IBMR 2.54%
- BSMQ $0.65
- IBMR $0.64
- BSMQ $0.05
- IBMR $0.05
- BSMQ Oct 19, 2026
- IBMR Oct 1, 2026
- BSMQ Oct 23, 2026
- IBMR Oct 6, 2026
- BSMQ Monthly
- IBMR Monthly
Distribution history
BSMQ vs IBMR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BSMQ 2.2%, betterIBMR 4.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- BSMQ −0.36IBMR 0.02, better
- Worst fall
- BSMQ −11.1%IBMR −4.8%
- Market sensitivity
- BSMQ 0.37IBMR 0.75
Popular comparisons
- 0.18% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.