IBMP ranks 1st and BSMQ 17th of 32 funds in the Defined-Maturity Municipal Category.
BSMQ vs IBMP
IBMP −0.08pt a year
0.18%0.10%
IBMP 2.1×the volume
50K105K
IBMP +0.3pt
+0.5%+0.8%
BSMQ vs IBMP Performance
+2.8%+4.3%
- BSMQ 0.18%
- IBMP 0.10%, better
- BSMQ $252M
- IBMP $685M
- BSMQ +2.2%
- IBMP +2.4%, better
- BSMQ 2.76%, better
- IBMP 2.53%
- BSMQ 1004
- IBMP 1859
- BSMQ 50K sh
- IBMP 105K sh, better
- BSMQ $23.52
- IBMP $25.35
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BSMQ | IBMP |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C45 | A87Higher |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | B63 | B66Higher |
| Tradability | B55 | A90Higher |
| Holdings | F23 | A96Higher |
| Durability | A76 | A94Higher |
Rank among Defined-Maturity Municipal funds
Same Category. BSMQ and IBMP are both graded against the same 32 Defined-Maturity Municipal funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BSMQC
IBMPA
In short
BSMQ One rung of a muni ladder in a single ticker: roughly 1,200 investment-grade municipal bonds, monthly distributions, and a built-in end date, with the fund set to terminate on or about Dec. 15, 2026 and pay out its net assets in cash.
IBMP A single rung of a muni ladder in one ticker: investment-grade bonds that all mature in 2027, tax-exempt income paid monthly along the way, and a defined end date instead of a fund that rolls on forever.
Stated mandate
BSMQ The fund seeks to track the Invesco BulletShares Municipal Bond 2026 Index by investing at least 80% of total assets in its municipal bonds. The portfolio is designed to mature in 2026 and terminate around December 15, 2026.
IBMP The fund seeks to track an index of investment-grade municipal bonds maturing in 2027. It is designed to provide tax-exempt income, support bond-ladder construction, and manage interest-rate risk through a defined maturity.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BSMQ vs IBMP Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BSMQ vs IBMP Cost
Overpaying BSMQ vs IBMP
$1,643
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BSMQ 0.18%
$3,749
IBMP 0.10%
$2,106
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BSMQ | IBMP | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $328 | $183 | $145 |
| 20 | $1,281 | $717 | $564 |
| 30 | $3,749 | $2,106 | $1,643 |
- 0.18%BSMQ
- 0.10%IBMP, cheaper
- Middle half of Defined-Maturity Municipal funds
- Median 0.18%
IBMP cheapest of 32 funds
BSMQ 10th cheapest of 32 funds
BSMQ vs IBMP Dividends
- BSMQ 2.76%, better
- IBMP 2.53%
- BSMQ $0.65
- IBMP $0.64
- BSMQ $0.05
- IBMP $0.06
- BSMQ Oct 19, 2026
- IBMP Oct 1, 2026
- BSMQ Oct 23, 2026
- IBMP Oct 6, 2026
- BSMQ Monthly
- IBMP Monthly
Distribution history
BSMQ vs IBMP Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- BSMQ
- IBMP
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BSMQ 2.2%, betterIBMP 2.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- BSMQ −0.36IBMP −0.33, better
- Worst fall
- BSMQ −11.1%IBMP −9.4%, better
- Market sensitivity
- BSMQ 0.37IBMP 0.40
Popular comparisons
- 0.18% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.