IBMQ ranks 2nd and BSMS 14th of 32 funds in the Defined-Maturity Municipal Category.
BSMS vs IBMQ
IBMQ −0.08pt a year
0.18%0.10%
IBMQ 1.4×the volume
89K129K
IBMQ +0.6pt
+0.2%+0.8%
BSMS vs IBMQ Performance
+1.2%+3.9%
- BSMS 0.18%
- IBMQ 0.10%, better
- BSMS $356M
- IBMQ $691M
- BSMS +2.1%
- IBMQ +2.2%, better
- BSMS 2.82%, better
- IBMQ 2.48%
- BSMS 2405
- IBMQ 2957
- BSMS 89K sh
- IBMQ 129K sh, better
- BSMS $23.14
- IBMQ $25.44
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BSMS | IBMQ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C45 | A87Higher |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | B55 | B58Higher |
| Tradability | B55 | A93Higher |
| Holdings | A72 | A94Higher |
| Durability | A74 | A95Higher |
Rank among Defined-Maturity Municipal funds
Same Category. BSMS and IBMQ are both graded against the same 32 Defined-Maturity Municipal funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BSMSB
IBMQA
In short
BSMS A ladder rung in a wrapper: roughly 2,200 municipal bonds that all come due by 2028, when the fund is designed to terminate. Most bond funds roll forever. This one has an end date on the box.
IBMQ A muni ladder rung in ETF form: thousands of investment-grade bonds that mature or get called by late 2028, then the fund winds up and pays out. AMT-free index, income paid monthly.
Stated mandate
BSMS The Fund seeks to track the Invesco BulletShares USD Municipal Bond 2028 Index by investing primarily in U.S.-dollar-denominated municipal securities issued by U.S. states, state agencies, or local governments. It uses representative sampling and is designed to terminate in December 2028.
IBMQ The fund seeks to track an index of investment-grade U.S. municipal bonds that are expected to mature or be redeemed before December 2, 2028.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BSMS vs IBMQ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BSMS vs IBMQ Cost
Overpaying BSMS vs IBMQ
$1,643
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BSMS 0.18%
$3,749
IBMQ 0.10%
$2,106
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BSMS | IBMQ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $328 | $183 | $145 |
| 20 | $1,281 | $717 | $564 |
| 30 | $3,749 | $2,106 | $1,643 |
- 0.18%BSMS
- 0.10%IBMQ, cheaper
- Middle half of Defined-Maturity Municipal funds
- Median 0.18%
IBMQ cheapest of 32 funds
BSMS 10th cheapest of 32 funds
BSMS vs IBMQ Dividends
- BSMS 2.82%, better
- IBMQ 2.48%
- BSMS $0.65
- IBMQ $0.63
- BSMS $0.06
- IBMQ $0.06
- BSMS Oct 19, 2026
- IBMQ Oct 1, 2026
- BSMS Oct 23, 2026
- IBMQ Oct 6, 2026
- BSMS Monthly
- IBMQ Monthly
Distribution history
BSMS vs IBMQ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- BSMS
- IBMQ
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BSMS 4.0%IBMQ 3.3%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- BSMS −0.07, betterIBMQ −0.14
- Worst fall
- BSMS −14.3%IBMQ −10.8%, better
- Market sensitivity
- BSMS 0.64IBMQ 0.54
Popular comparisons
- 0.18% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.