IBMR ranks 3rd and BSMS 14th of 32 funds in the Defined-Maturity Municipal Category.
BSMS vs IBMR
IBMR −0.08pt a year
0.18%0.10%
IBMR 1.2×the volume
89K105K
IBMR +0.3pt
+4.2%+4.5%
BSMS vs IBMR Performance
+2.1%+1.6%
- BSMS 0.18%
- IBMR 0.10%, better
- BSMS $356M
- IBMR $527M
- BSMS +2.1%, better
- IBMR +1.6%
- BSMS 2.82%, better
- IBMR 2.54%
- BSMS 2405
- IBMR 2071
- BSMS 89K sh
- IBMR 105K sh, better
- BSMS $23.14
- IBMR $25.16
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BSMS | IBMR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C45 | A87Higher |
| Mission | A96 | |
| Risk | B55Higher | C54 |
| Tradability | B55 | A83Higher |
| Holdings | A72 | A89Higher |
| Durability | A74 | A85Higher |
Rank among Defined-Maturity Municipal funds
Same Category. BSMS and IBMR are both graded against the same 32 Defined-Maturity Municipal funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BSMSB
IBMRA
In short
BSMS A ladder rung in a wrapper: roughly 2,200 municipal bonds that all come due by 2028, when the fund is designed to terminate. Most bond funds roll forever. This one has an end date on the box.
IBMR A muni ladder rung in one ticker: it holds investment-grade municipal bonds maturing in 2029, tracks an AMT-free index, and pays monthly. Bond-style term structure, ETF plumbing.
Stated mandate
BSMS The Fund seeks to track the Invesco BulletShares USD Municipal Bond 2028 Index by investing primarily in U.S.-dollar-denominated municipal securities issued by U.S. states, state agencies, or local governments. It uses representative sampling and is designed to terminate in December 2028.
IBMR The fund seeks to track an index of investment-grade municipal bonds that mature in 2029.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BSMS vs IBMR Holdings
How BSMS and IBMR differ
Two bond funds rarely hold the same issues.
Level by level
Sector
No Sector split for BSMS.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in BSMSMore in IBMR | BSMS | IBMR |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| United Kingdom | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Concentration
- BSMS4.7%
- IBMR4.8%
- BSMS1,764
- IBMR1,324
Asset class
- BSMS
- Fixed Income
- IBMR
- Fixed Income
Holdings
Two bond funds rarely hold the same issues, so this page lists no shared Holdings. BSMS holds 1,764 securities, IBMR 1,324.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BSMS vs IBMR Cost
Overpaying BSMS vs IBMR
$1,643
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BSMS 0.18%
$3,749
IBMR 0.10%
$2,106
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BSMS | IBMR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $328 | $183 | $145 |
| 20 | $1,281 | $717 | $564 |
| 30 | $3,749 | $2,106 | $1,643 |
- 0.18%BSMS
- 0.10%IBMR, cheaper
- Middle half of Defined-Maturity Municipal funds
- Median 0.18%
IBMR cheapest of 32 funds
BSMS 10th cheapest of 32 funds
BSMS vs IBMR Dividends
- BSMS 2.82%, better
- IBMR 2.54%
- BSMS $0.65
- IBMR $0.64
- BSMS $0.06
- IBMR $0.05
- BSMS Oct 19, 2026
- IBMR Oct 1, 2026
- BSMS Oct 23, 2026
- IBMR Oct 6, 2026
- BSMS Monthly
- IBMR Monthly
Distribution history
BSMS vs IBMR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BSMS 4.0%, betterIBMR 4.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- BSMS −0.07IBMR 0.02, better
- Worst fall
- BSMS −14.3%IBMR −4.8%
- Market sensitivity
- BSMS 0.64IBMR 0.75
Popular comparisons
- 0.18% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.