IBMP ranks 1st and BSMS 14th of 32 funds in the Defined-Maturity Municipal Category.
BSMS vs IBMP
IBMP −0.08pt a year
0.18%0.10%
IBMP 1.2×the volume
89K105K
IBMP +0.6pt
+0.2%+0.8%
BSMS vs IBMP Performance
+1.2%+4.3%
- BSMS 0.18%
- IBMP 0.10%, better
- BSMS $356M
- IBMP $685M
- BSMS +2.1%
- IBMP +2.4%, better
- BSMS 2.82%, better
- IBMP 2.53%
- BSMS 2405
- IBMP 1859
- BSMS 89K sh
- IBMP 105K sh, better
- BSMS $23.14
- IBMP $25.35
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BSMS | IBMP |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C45 | A87Higher |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | B55 | B66Higher |
| Tradability | B55 | A90Higher |
| Holdings | A72 | A96Higher |
| Durability | A74 | A94Higher |
Rank among Defined-Maturity Municipal funds
Same Category. BSMS and IBMP are both graded against the same 32 Defined-Maturity Municipal funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BSMSB
IBMPA
In short
BSMS A ladder rung in a wrapper: roughly 2,200 municipal bonds that all come due by 2028, when the fund is designed to terminate. Most bond funds roll forever. This one has an end date on the box.
IBMP A single rung of a muni ladder in one ticker: investment-grade bonds that all mature in 2027, tax-exempt income paid monthly along the way, and a defined end date instead of a fund that rolls on forever.
Stated mandate
BSMS The Fund seeks to track the Invesco BulletShares USD Municipal Bond 2028 Index by investing primarily in U.S.-dollar-denominated municipal securities issued by U.S. states, state agencies, or local governments. It uses representative sampling and is designed to terminate in December 2028.
IBMP The fund seeks to track an index of investment-grade municipal bonds maturing in 2027. It is designed to provide tax-exempt income, support bond-ladder construction, and manage interest-rate risk through a defined maturity.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BSMS vs IBMP Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BSMS vs IBMP Cost
Overpaying BSMS vs IBMP
$1,643
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BSMS 0.18%
$3,749
IBMP 0.10%
$2,106
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BSMS | IBMP | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $328 | $183 | $145 |
| 20 | $1,281 | $717 | $564 |
| 30 | $3,749 | $2,106 | $1,643 |
- 0.18%BSMS
- 0.10%IBMP, cheaper
- Middle half of Defined-Maturity Municipal funds
- Median 0.18%
IBMP cheapest of 32 funds
BSMS 10th cheapest of 32 funds
BSMS vs IBMP Dividends
- BSMS 2.82%, better
- IBMP 2.53%
- BSMS $0.65
- IBMP $0.64
- BSMS $0.06
- IBMP $0.06
- BSMS Oct 19, 2026
- IBMP Oct 1, 2026
- BSMS Oct 23, 2026
- IBMP Oct 6, 2026
- BSMS Monthly
- IBMP Monthly
Distribution history
BSMS vs IBMP Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- BSMS
- IBMP
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BSMS 4.0%IBMP 2.3%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- BSMS −0.07, betterIBMP −0.33
- Worst fall
- BSMS −14.3%IBMP −9.4%, better
- Market sensitivity
- BSMS 0.64IBMP 0.40
Popular comparisons
- 0.18% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.