IBMQ ranks 1st and BSMV 13th of 32 funds in the Defined-Maturity Municipal Category.
BSMV vs IBMQ
IBMQ −0.08pt a year
0.18%0.10%
IBMQ 1.7×the volume
80.8K138K
IBMQ +1.4pt
−0.7%+0.7%
BSMV vs IBMQ Performance
−3.6%+3.6%
- BSMV 0.18%
- IBMQ 0.10%, better
- BSMV $211M
- IBMQ $692M
- BSMV +0.9%
- IBMQ +2.3%, better
- BSMV 2.97%, better
- IBMQ 2.49%
- BSMV 1646
- IBMQ 2968
- BSMV 80.8K sh
- IBMQ 138K sh, better
- BSMV $20.65
- IBMQ $25.43
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BSMV | IBMQ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C45 | A87Higher |
| Mission | A80 | A100Higher |
| Risk | D36 | B59Higher |
| Tradability | C50 | A92Higher |
| Holdings | A71 | A93Higher |
| Durability | B61 | A94Higher |
Rank among Defined-Maturity Municipal funds
Same Category. BSMV and IBMQ are both graded against the same 32 Defined-Maturity Municipal funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BSMVB
IBMQA
In short
BSMV BulletShares brought bond-ladder math to ETFs, and this is the municipal rung: roughly 1,500 muni bonds tracking a 2031-dated index, paying monthly. One dated slice you can stack with other years instead of buying bonds one at a time.
IBMQ A muni ladder rung in ETF form: thousands of investment-grade bonds that mature or get called by late 2028, then the fund winds up and pays out. AMT-free index, income paid monthly.
Stated mandate
BSMV The fund seeks exposure to a portfolio of U.S.-dollar municipal securities through its index and invests at least 80% of total assets in municipal bonds included in that index.
IBMQ The fund seeks to track an index of investment-grade U.S. municipal bonds that are expected to mature or be redeemed before December 2, 2028.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BSMV vs IBMQ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BSMV vs IBMQ Cost
Overpaying BSMV vs IBMQ
$1,643
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BSMV 0.18%
$3,749
IBMQ 0.10%
$2,106
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BSMV | IBMQ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $328 | $183 | $145 |
| 20 | $1,281 | $717 | $564 |
| 30 | $3,749 | $2,106 | $1,643 |
- 0.18%BSMV
- 0.10%IBMQ, cheaper
- Middle half of Defined-Maturity Municipal funds
- Median 0.18%
IBMQ cheapest of 32 funds
BSMV 10th cheapest of 32 funds
BSMV vs IBMQ Dividends
- BSMV 2.97%, better
- IBMQ 2.49%
- BSMV $0.62
- IBMQ $0.63
- BSMV $0.05
- IBMQ $0.06
- BSMV Oct 19, 2026
- IBMQ Nov 2, 2026
- BSMV Oct 23, 2026
- IBMQ Nov 5, 2026
- BSMV Monthly
- IBMQ Monthly
Distribution history
BSMV vs IBMQ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- BSMV
- IBMQ
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BSMV 6.0%IBMQ 3.3%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- BSMV −0.02, betterIBMQ −0.14
- Worst fall
- BSMV −20.7%IBMQ −10.8%, better
- Market sensitivity
- BSMV 1.04IBMQ 0.54
Popular comparisons
- 0.18% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.