IBMR ranks 3rd and BSMV 13th of 32 funds in the Defined-Maturity Municipal Category.
BSMV vs IBMR
IBMR −0.08pt a year
0.18%0.10%
IBMR 1.4×the volume
80.8K109K
IBMR +0.2pt
+3.8%+4.0%
BSMV vs IBMR Performance
+0.9%+2.0%
- BSMV 0.18%
- IBMR 0.10%, better
- BSMV $211M
- IBMR $535M
- BSMV +0.9%
- IBMR +2.0%, better
- BSMV 2.97%, better
- IBMR 2.53%
- BSMV 1646
- IBMR 2087
- BSMV 80.8K sh
- IBMR 109K sh, better
- BSMV $20.65
- IBMR $25.18
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BSMV | IBMR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C45 | A87Higher |
| Mission | A80 | A96Higher |
| Risk | D36 | C48Higher |
| Tradability | C50 | A82Higher |
| Holdings | A71 | A83Higher |
| Durability | B61 | A85Higher |
Rank among Defined-Maturity Municipal funds
Same Category. BSMV and IBMR are both graded against the same 32 Defined-Maturity Municipal funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BSMVB
IBMRA
In short
BSMV BulletShares brought bond-ladder math to ETFs, and this is the municipal rung: roughly 1,500 muni bonds tracking a 2031-dated index, paying monthly. One dated slice you can stack with other years instead of buying bonds one at a time.
IBMR A muni ladder rung in one ticker: it holds investment-grade municipal bonds maturing in 2029, tracks an AMT-free index, and pays monthly. Bond-style term structure, ETF plumbing.
Stated mandate
BSMV The fund seeks exposure to a portfolio of U.S.-dollar municipal securities through its index and invests at least 80% of total assets in municipal bonds included in that index.
IBMR The fund seeks to track an index of investment-grade municipal bonds that mature in 2029.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BSMV vs IBMR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BSMV vs IBMR Cost
Overpaying BSMV vs IBMR
$1,643
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BSMV 0.18%
$3,749
IBMR 0.10%
$2,106
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BSMV | IBMR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $328 | $183 | $145 |
| 20 | $1,281 | $717 | $564 |
| 30 | $3,749 | $2,106 | $1,643 |
- 0.18%BSMV
- 0.10%IBMR, cheaper
- Middle half of Defined-Maturity Municipal funds
- Median 0.18%
IBMR cheapest of 32 funds
BSMV 10th cheapest of 32 funds
BSMV vs IBMR Dividends
- BSMV 2.97%, better
- IBMR 2.53%
- BSMV $0.62
- IBMR $0.64
- BSMV $0.05
- IBMR $0.05
- BSMV Oct 19, 2026
- IBMR Nov 2, 2026
- BSMV Oct 23, 2026
- IBMR Nov 5, 2026
- BSMV Monthly
- IBMR Monthly
Distribution history
BSMV vs IBMR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BSMV 6.0%IBMR 4.4%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- BSMV −0.02IBMR 0.02, better
- Worst fall
- BSMV −20.7%IBMR −4.8%
- Market sensitivity
- BSMV 1.04IBMR 0.75
Popular comparisons
- 0.18% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.