IBMP ranks 1st and BSMV 13th of 32 funds in the Defined-Maturity Municipal Category.
BSMV vs IBMP
IBMP −0.08pt a year
0.18%0.10%
IBMP 1.4×the volume
80.8K112K
IBMP +1.5pt
−0.7%+0.8%
BSMV vs IBMP Performance
−3.6%+4.0%
- BSMV 0.18%
- IBMP 0.10%, better
- BSMV $211M
- IBMP $684M
- BSMV +0.9%
- IBMP +2.3%, better
- BSMV 2.97%, better
- IBMP 2.55%
- BSMV 1646
- IBMP 1857
- BSMV 80.8K sh
- IBMP 112K sh, better
- BSMV $20.65
- IBMP $25.32
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BSMV | IBMP |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C45 | A87Higher |
| Mission | A80 | A100Higher |
| Risk | D36 | B59Higher |
| Tradability | C50 | A89Higher |
| Holdings | A71 | A94Higher |
| Durability | B61 | A94Higher |
Rank among Defined-Maturity Municipal funds
Same Category. BSMV and IBMP are both graded against the same 32 Defined-Maturity Municipal funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BSMVB
IBMPA
In short
BSMV BulletShares brought bond-ladder math to ETFs, and this is the municipal rung: roughly 1,500 muni bonds tracking a 2031-dated index, paying monthly. One dated slice you can stack with other years instead of buying bonds one at a time.
IBMP A single rung of a muni ladder in one ticker: investment-grade bonds that all mature in 2027, tax-exempt income paid monthly along the way, and a defined end date instead of a fund that rolls on forever.
Stated mandate
BSMV The fund seeks exposure to a portfolio of U.S.-dollar municipal securities through its index and invests at least 80% of total assets in municipal bonds included in that index.
IBMP The fund seeks to track an index of investment-grade municipal bonds maturing in 2027. It is designed to provide tax-exempt income, support bond-ladder construction, and manage interest-rate risk through a defined maturity.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BSMV vs IBMP Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BSMV vs IBMP Cost
Overpaying BSMV vs IBMP
$1,643
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BSMV 0.18%
$3,749
IBMP 0.10%
$2,106
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BSMV | IBMP | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $328 | $183 | $145 |
| 20 | $1,281 | $717 | $564 |
| 30 | $3,749 | $2,106 | $1,643 |
- 0.18%BSMV
- 0.10%IBMP, cheaper
- Middle half of Defined-Maturity Municipal funds
- Median 0.18%
IBMP cheapest of 32 funds
BSMV 10th cheapest of 32 funds
BSMV vs IBMP Dividends
- BSMV 2.97%, better
- IBMP 2.55%
- BSMV $0.62
- IBMP $0.65
- BSMV $0.05
- IBMP $0.06
- BSMV Oct 19, 2026
- IBMP Nov 2, 2026
- BSMV Oct 23, 2026
- IBMP Nov 5, 2026
- BSMV Monthly
- IBMP Monthly
Distribution history
BSMV vs IBMP Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- BSMV
- IBMP
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BSMV 6.0%IBMP 2.3%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- BSMV −0.02, betterIBMP −0.33
- Worst fall
- BSMV −20.7%IBMP −9.4%, better
- Market sensitivity
- BSMV 1.04IBMP 0.40
Popular comparisons
- 0.18% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.