Skip to content

BSTP vs HJUN

Innovator Buffer Step-Up Strategy ETF

BSTPDNYSE Arca

Corgi U.S. Equities 100% Structured Buffer ETF - June Series

HJUNCCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

HJUN −0.59pt a year

BSTP0.89%HJUN0.30%

Avg volume · 30D

BSTP 4.0×the volume

BSTP4.11KHJUN1.03K

BSTP vs HJUN Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

+1.0%BSTP+1.0%HJUN

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. BSTP +1.0%. HJUN +1.0%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%1.5%2%2.5%3%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
BSTP 0.89%
HJUN 0.30%, better
Fund size
BSTP $59M
HJUN $3M
1Y total return
BSTP +8.3%
HJUN No data
Holdings
BSTP 3
HJUN 4
Avg volume (30D)
BSTP 4.11K sh, better
HJUN 1.03K sh
NAV per share
BSTP $39.96
HJUN $25.34
52W range

ETF.net Grade

BSTP: Cost 9, Risk 36, Mission not scored, Tradability 66, Holdings not scored, Durability 62. HJUN: Cost 91, Risk 60, Mission not scored, Tradability 9, Holdings not scored, Durability 13.
Pillar letters and Scores for BSTP, HJUN, with each pillar’s weight
PillarBSTPHJUN
Cost30% weightF9A91Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightD36B60Higher
Tradability15% weightB66HigherF9
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightB62HigherF13

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. BSTP and HJUN are both graded against the same 7 S&P 500 Buffer funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer⁠

Category · 7 funds
See all 7 ›

HJUN ranks 4th and BSTP 7th of 7 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer Category.

  1. Rank 4CFBProShares S&P 500 Dynamic Buffer ETFScore 40
  2. Rank 4CHJUNCorgi U.S. Equities 100% Structured Buffer ETF - June SeriesScore 40
  3. Rank 6DDHSBDay Hagan Smart Buffer ETFScore 34
  4. Rank 7DBSTPInnovator Buffer Step-Up Strategy ETFScore 32

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

BSTPDInnovator Buffer Step-Up Strategy ETF

HJUNCCorgi U.S. Equities 100% Structured Buffer ETF - June Series

In short

BSTP Most buffer ETFs freeze your cap and buffer for a full year. BSTP is the active version: FLEX options on SPY that the manager can reset monthly, so the terms follow the market rather than a calendar.

HJUN No data

Stated mandate

BSTP BSTP seeks risk-managed exposure to SPY through FLEX options and may invest directly in SPY or its components. It actively monitors and may reset the options portfolio monthly, seeking participation in SPY returns with an upside limit and protection against a measure of downside loss.

HJUN No data

Why people hold it

  • BSTP No 12-month lock. The manager monitors the options book and can reset it monthly, seeking SPY participation with a limit on the upside and protection against a measure of downside loss.
  • The step-up design lets the options be re-struck as SPY moves, instead of leaving the fund anchored to a reference level set at the start of a long outcome period.
  • One ticker, no calendar to babysit: the resetting happens inside the fund, which can also hold SPY or its underlying stocks directly alongside the options.
  • Live since 2022, so the strategy has run through real market stress rather than a backtest.

HJUN No data

Worth knowing

  • BSTP The 0.89% expense ratio sits at the pricier end of SPY buffer funds. Innovator's dated series on the same reference, such as PMAY, lists 0.79%.
  • Thinly traded, so bid-ask spreads can run wider than in the largest buffer names.
  • Flexibility cuts both ways: with terms able to change at each reset, the cap and buffer in force aren't readable off a calendar and need checking against the fund's posted terms.

HJUN No data

Full BSTP profile⁠

Full HJUN profile⁠

BSTP vs HJUN Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

BSTP vs HJUN Cost

Overpaying BSTP vs HJUN

$10,723

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • BSTP 0.89%

    $16,872

  • HJUN 0.30%

    $6,149

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • BSTP 0.89%
  • HJUN 0.30%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530BSTP $16,872HJUN $6,149

Year by year

YearBSTPHJUNOverpaying
10$1,576$545$1,031
20$5,953$2,113$3,840
30$16,872$6,149$10,723

Expense ratio

  • 0.89%BSTP
  • 0.30%HJUN, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer funds
  • Median 0.64%

HJUN cheapest of 7 funds

BSTP 7th cheapest of 7 funds

BSTP vs HJUN Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
BSTP None
HJUN None

Distribution history

BSTPAll BSTP payments⁠

No distribution history available.

HJUNAll HJUN payments⁠

No distribution history available.

BSTP vs HJUN Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
BSTP 7.8%HJUN No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
BSTP 1.31HJUN No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
BSTP −16.7%since Mar 2022HJUN No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
BSTP 0.69HJUN 0.21

Popular comparisons

  • BSTPDvsSWANB

    Innovator Buffer Step-Up Strategy ETF · Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.89% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • HJUNCvsSWANB

    Corgi U.S. Equities 100% Structured Buffer ETF - June Series · Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BSTPDvsPSFFB

    Innovator Buffer Step-Up Strategy ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.89% · 0.66%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • HJUNCvsPSFFB

    Corgi U.S. Equities 100% Structured Buffer ETF - June Series · Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.66%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BSTPDvsQBSVC

    Innovator Buffer Step-Up Strategy ETF · AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer5 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.89% · 0.64%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • HJUNCvsQBSVC

    Corgi U.S. Equities 100% Structured Buffer ETF - June Series · AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer5 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.64%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.